3 ms·

Please review the stated history of events—-it IS extremely unlikely. She is making a case in the court of public opinion. Granted she has more clout than the

Please review the stated history of events—-it IS extremely unlikely. She is making a case in the court of public opinion. Granted she has more clout than the “average joe” (and the very fact that this is even being discussed is evidence for it) but ANY case without corroborating evidence is just hearsay. She should “put up or shut-up” and the levels of “put” required are so minimal that her PR credibility before the “court” on this matter has a very short half-life.

reginold 5y ago
> Granted she has more clout than the “average joe” (and the very fact that this is even being discussed is evidence for it) but ANY case without corroborating evidence is just hearsay. An anonymous poster on reddit had a similar issue a few days ago [0]. Their comment got 331 points on HN while this one got 257 points so far. The anonymous one got more points. Is it possible you're wrong about this aspect? [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29443645 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29443645
- jfrunyon 5y ago
  Indeed, she did copy this story directly from an anonymous poster on Reddit, other than making up some details that don't even make sense given the rest of her story. And yet people still believe her.