Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
vehemenz
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
1.
▲
by
vehemenz
5d ago
> Also with lower-case initial. disparaging. Opposed to new technology or ways of working; disliking technological change and innovation. From the OED. The predominant use of "Luddite" has been disparaging for a long time. You
2.
▲
by
vehemenz
5d ago
If there's a criticism here, it's that they don't mention k8s right up front. It's completely opaque what this tool is. "Orchestration" can mean literally anything. The web page presents ax as a typical develop
3.
▲
by
vehemenz
5d ago
Pros and cons. The sloppy approach actually works well for Claude because its memory retrieval is more reliable than AGENTS.md style instructions.
4.
▲
by
vehemenz
5d ago
It's kinda true. I use the terminal approach too, but I wouldn't trust every type of user with this long of a leash. There's a place for instituting systems that share context, manage authentication, and is permissions-aware.
5.
▲
by
vehemenz
6d ago
While we’re asking rhetorical questions, why is China’s cultural development behind tiny, poor European countries?
6.
▲
by
vehemenz
6d ago
History, philosophy, literature, journalism, art, education. The list goes on.
7.
▲
by
vehemenz
6d ago
What do you mean the point of AI? The point of AI is to do whatever I tell it to do. Its lack of “quality” (always invoked in a metaphysical sense) isn’t a problem for most of its uses. It can automate, research, build boilerplate, and test
8.
▲
by
vehemenz
10d ago
Agreed, but on other dimensions China is still 150 years behind the West. It’s important to keep this progress in perspective.
9.
▲
by
vehemenz
10d ago
Except HTML is already a presentational markup language. People lose track of this. Consider: MathML has a presentational schema and a content schema. The whole point of presentational MathML is the intermingling of concerns. If you want in
10.
▲
by
vehemenz
10d ago
This seems like a radical, unsupported conclusion to draw from a single frontend architecture decision. Maybe there's an overwhelmingly positive case to be made for high-abstraction CSS with hidden structures. Outside those few select
11.
▲
by
vehemenz
11d ago
The CSS Zen Garden worked because everyone was using a single markup file. In real life, it doesn't really work. Instead of thinking of separation of concerns as a religious principle, think about what benefits it actually yields in th
12.
▲
by
vehemenz
12d ago
$90k gets you a good quality of life in most of the US, too.
13.
▲
by
vehemenz
14d ago
Sure. Which one? If it’s CPI just say CPI.
14.
▲
by
vehemenz
16d ago
Which metric of inflation are you adjusting it to? And which assumptions are built into the goods and services measured, as well as their respective weights, of that index?
15.
▲
by
vehemenz
16d ago
Hear, hear.
16.
▲
by
vehemenz
16d ago
Showing the CPI next to these price increases wouldn’t hurt. If anything, it shows the problem with a single measure of inflation.
17.
▲
by
vehemenz
16d ago
I’m not sure what to tell you. With only a few exceptions, the shorthand follows a very predictable pattern if you already know the property names. IDE completions help too.
18.
▲
by
vehemenz
17d ago
I don't really get this argument. 90% of Tailwind is shorthand for existing CSS properties. There's really not much to learn if you already know CSS.
19.
▲
by
vehemenz
17d ago
What do you mean by vanilla CSS? I can't be the only one who has no idea what this means. Do you mean high-abstraction classes that are bound to the DOM arbitrarily, and are difficult to change later? We've had 25+ years to see ho
20.
▲
by
vehemenz
17d ago
Do you have an argument, or are you coasting on the "trust me bro" vibes of the parent?
21.
▲
by
vehemenz
17d ago
These are the same anti-Tailwind arguments that have been circulating forever. If you want to build a case against Tailwind that's actually compelling, you should start by understanding what it is first. Only then can you compare it to
22.
▲
by
vehemenz
17d ago
AI and Tailwind-based template systems sort of stole Tailwind's lunch, so I'm glad there was light at the end of the tunnel for Adam and co.
23.
▲
by
vehemenz
20d ago
> Writing is thinking. This way of phrasing it is needlessly confusing. Writing is a kind of thinking--one of many--but it's not equivalent to thinking. Dialectical thinking, for example, produces similar results.
24.
▲
by
vehemenz
20d ago
Hey, let’s not forget Cloudflare
25.
▲
by
vehemenz
21d ago
It's a neat approach for the current problem of untracked dotfile accumulation. The real problem is that the entire reason to use git at this point is because of the conventions established around it. There are better VCSes and methods
26.
▲
by
vehemenz
23d ago
Nice try, Mark.
27.
▲
by
vehemenz
24d ago
Supposedly Fable 5.1 is better, but I haven't tried it yet. I've run into the same thing with mundane work that is barely bio/cyber adjacent. Re: Chinese models, even if the model itself isn't censored, some of the big m
28.
▲
by
vehemenz
24d ago
Though it's associated with Africa, head portage was commonly practiced nearly everywhere. https://youtu.be/BRnwg3dpboc?t=731
29.
▲
by
vehemenz
25d ago
If we sample from Zitron’s claims, a lot of them are wrong. Probably most of them. I think his contribution to the discourse is the bigger picture. These companies are going into potentially economy-wrecking debt over a speculative future t
30.
▲
by
vehemenz
25d ago
I can’t speak for mobile, but the desktop/web product has been a disaster for years. When Spotify went full Electron a few years back, a bunch of standard macOS keyboard shortcuts stopped working. These issues were on their “support” f
More ›