Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ve55
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
63 ms
·
571.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
>From 2003 to 2008, the gender pay gap at the reporting companies shrank 7 percent, from 18.9 percent down to 17.5 percent Is this really a large enough effect size to justify such a headline? >Our findings suggest that regulatory man
572.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
Applying equalizing measures post-hoc without adjusting for baseline rates or confounders cannot be done in a reasonably fair way. Not only is the baseline rate of women seeking funding much lower, but there may be many other variables that
573.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
Yes.
574.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
Article contains no information that suggests JPM is fueling a modern financial crisis, it only discusses past events.
575.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
This shouldn't be a surprise to anyone who allows their browser to run all the Javascript that companies want it to (of course, assuming they have a decent understanding of the web to begin with, which is a huge limiting factor). Readi
576.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
GoDaddy has always been one of the worst providers or registrars someone can use. I wish I was surprised by a practice this bad.
577.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
But yet all 4,000 of them still work for the largest surveillance corporation that has ever existed. At least now they think they have the moral high ground.
578.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
Who is going to stop them? I'm sure the data is worth >0 to them (or someone)
579.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
It seems to imply from the homepage that everything is local, or at least that your images remain local and thus the program runs locally, but I believe the actual training of the neural network occurs on their server, so you have to tell t
580.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
I'm not voicing agreement with your parent comment, but for a better understanding more data is needed than just broad correlations. Without additional information you cannot accurately pinpoint where causalities begin and end as well
581.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
They're all trying to present the same information. Just as every video site looks like Youtube with video thumbnails, titles, search, comments, etc, it's just the best way we have to display some styles of information. Github see
582.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
>At this point, I believe the only function of the police is to execute state violence. It would be best to form your opinion based on overall statistics rather than the most sensational news articles that have the most virility.
583.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
A small proportion of people doing a weird practice shouldn't be enough to warrant a generalized headline line this.
584.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
Why anyone would think a Facebook execute is 'saintly' to begin with is beyond me. Article has no useful content.
585.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
Good. It's funny we have HIPAA but yet Google is able to collect significantly more personal information than just healthcare information on us, yet there is not a single regulation they need to truly care about.
586.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
I'd be surprised if the ACLU continues down that path in the coming years. They're having a difficult time remaining neutral in the way they used to be.
587.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
The part about these convictions that bugs me is that some of the people getting in trouble were definitely not aware that they were breaking the law. It surprises a lot of people when they find out it's illegal to buy and sell bitcoin
588.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
What is even more interesting and relevant is what we will do when videos are regularly and intentionally modified or created, and in much more striking ways than this one. I'm surprised we haven't already seen some good attempts
589.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
>Update: This article has been update with comment from Springer, a publisher of academic research, which has dropped ACE as a client after 14 years of working with the conference. Do we really need to go through this again? Is this what
590.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
Well-said. Reminds me of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust_Me,_I%27m_Lying
591.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
>but as long as they are based in fact, I consider that reporting of the news of the day The issue is that they get to pick which facts are reported and which are not. They could publish 100 articles on all the good things Google is doin
592.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
Kind of funny how the NYT publishes the original story to generate outrage, then after successfully doing so to an extent, cherry-picks examples of the outrage in order to generate yet another article that is apparently worth publishing. Of
593.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
>correcting the biases, conscious or not, that have led to the poor diversity of our communities What you're missing is a proof that the only reason a community is not 'diverse' is due to 'biases' within the comm
594.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
I don't like the implications that his tweets are what cause all of the stock's price movements. Sometimes they obviously have an impact, with his infamous $420 privatization tweet being the best example, but as for the last few d
595.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
It is one thing to take a side and believe one party is lying, but it's quite another to say you are 100% sure in your correctness and also describe yourself as 'nonpartisan'.
596.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
I haven't claimed that Google sells your data for a profit. Other centralized services carry risks as well, but some of them have profit models that are focused on something other than scooping up every bit of data possible, with some
597.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
It could, but an email leak can be much more than it sounds. We have already had data breaches that have resulted in multiple deaths[1]. Just wait until we have one many times worse than this. Data breaches of the future will cause more tha
598.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
>Google does not reveal my identity to partners; What you're spreading is fake news. We know for a fact data was at least shared with the NSA in the past. We also know Google complies with legal requests, could have a partial data
599.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
You can't think up a single reason why you might not want every purchase you've made in your entire life to be logged in a centralized database completely outside of your control and view which will be kept forever and shared with
600.
▲
by
ve55
8y ago
Pretty chilling that 'private' companies like this are able to set up such operations that could easily sway federal election results without providing any transparency or having many regulations to follow.
More ›