Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ux-app
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
61.
▲
by
ux-app
4y ago
>On the other hand, they can't handle actual logic, reasoning, etc. what is "actual reasoning"? Another HN user posted this ( https://imgur.com/HOEnxYb ) response to the prompt: "is throwing a rubber du
62.
▲
by
ux-app
4y ago
>Not really? I mean if you ask people to explain the 10 endings to Inside that's just the computer doing what computers do. the point is that humans routinely and confidently state their opinion as fact, any online forum will demons
63.
▲
by
ux-app
4y ago
Computers are the ultimate appeal to authority in the style of "Computer says no". >If you make a mistake and honestly ask ChatGPT to produce the answer to something that doesn't exist, it will happily oblige. Just like as
64.
▲
by
ux-app
4y ago
>However, based on the information provided, it can be inferred that the fireman may be concerned about the contents of the case this is complex "reasoning" (or whatever ChatGPT is doing. My 5 year old would struggle with the c
65.
▲
by
ux-app
4y ago
this is mind blowing to me. can anyone with more knowledge on the topic explain how ChatGPT is demonstrating this level of what seems like genuine understanding and reasoning? Like others I assumed that ChatGPT is gluing words together that
66.
▲
by
ux-app
4y ago
yes, it's a great browser
67.
▲
by
ux-app
4y ago
the point was that Google Video sucked and wasn't able to beat YouTube. Same story for Google+
68.
▲
by
ux-app
4y ago
I'll take Libraries over Frameworks every time.
69.
▲
by
ux-app
4y ago
I'm in Australia, there is no way for me to remove the overdraft.
70.
▲
by
ux-app
4y ago
>Are you saying you should empty your account constantly This doesn't really help. When you link your bank account with PayPal the link is 2 way. I.e. PayPal can, without any input from you, transfer money out of your account. They
71.
▲
by
ux-app
4y ago
Great comment, thank you. >breaking co-dependency habits and other boyhood things a lot of guys never manage to grow past could you elaborate?
72.
▲
by
ux-app
4y ago
>Regardless, it's in your best interest to work towards a resistance. Uninstalling the app was a 100% effective solution.
73.
▲
by
ux-app
4y ago
> I’ve come to believe it’s really that simple. It's really not though. These apps are addictive! There's a real effort required to drop them and many(most?) people don't have what it takes to kick the habit. I installed T
74.
▲
by
ux-app
4y ago
>Food is also a basic need, but does not get any of the attention because it is a functioning market. If bread and milk were being hoarded by speculators (not some random luxury like truffles) you'd be hearing exactly the same discu
75.
▲
by
ux-app
4y ago
Not all assets are equal. Shelter is a basic human need. Creating an environment that allows speculation in this asset is bad. Progressively tax the shit out of each subsequent property owned. Prevent foreign/corporate ownership of pro
76.
▲
by
ux-app
4y ago
It might end up having the opposite effect. When all sides of an argument can bomb each other with AI generated content it could poison the well and make people less likely to believe things they see.
77.
▲
by
ux-app
4y ago
the data is all right there in JSON, so I guess you could add your own using JS
78.
▲
by
ux-app
4y ago
thanks for sharing man, some hard earned wisdom.
79.
▲
by
ux-app
5y ago
what if there're those pesky quantum thingamajiggies which make simulating in silicon impossible?
80.
▲
by
ux-app
5y ago
>his can certainly exist on a theoretical thought experiment level but not in a physical world which has finite resources. I've always though of singularity as a sort of runaway progress scenario. Human brains run on a few hundred c
81.
▲
by
ux-app
5y ago
>You aren’t interested in doing that? Only insofar as it doesn't inconvenience me. I'm not trying to convince you of my pov, it's just my personal opinion. I think that individual action is no more than privileged westerne
82.
▲
by
ux-app
5y ago
cool! I hope we go all self driving in my lifetime, i'd be so stoked to not have to worry about my young boys driving when they become teenagers :)
83.
▲
by
ux-app
5y ago
fwiw, I agree that progress has been astounding in the past 10 years... but on the other hand I really do wonder what the limits of the current approach is. After all humans don't drive by analysing 1 frame at a time, we have a model o
84.
▲
by
ux-app
5y ago
>How would materially closer not meet the bar for closer? I don't have a horse in this race, but I think what the other commenter was getting at is that: if there were 10 problems that needed solving 5 years ago, and in the course o
85.
▲
by
ux-app
5y ago
>A lot of hard work, non vehicular labor, local sourcing, and luck, providence, perseverance, and serendipity. none of this will make any difference. >How do you suppose humans did it prior to the invention of the coal mine and oil dr
86.
▲
by
ux-app
5y ago
>Whatever you think of as a humane activity, I can find a reason why it's destroying the planet so you may as well not bother - just continue destroying the planet as you are yes that's correct, there is nothing you can persona
87.
▲
by
ux-app
5y ago
>But I assure you it’s entirely possible to live and have all of those goods, today, fossil-fuel free Well I'd be curious to hear how. Even the apple in your pantry requires significant fossil fuel input. Fertilizer: Fossil fuel bas
88.
▲
by
ux-app
5y ago
Wasn't a glib comment, I think almost everything is either produced or consumed with the help of fossil fuels. >Music, art, books, comedy, pets, food, land, clothing, shelter. Every one of these requires fossil fuel input to some de
89.
▲
by
ux-app
5y ago
>paying individual people as a direct incentive to reduce their own carbon output Is there anything you can spend this money on that is not produced using fossil fuels?
90.
▲
by
ux-app
5y ago
yeah it turned into bizzaro world for a few months, which was especially weird since we were basically Covid free for the majority of the past 2 years.
More ›