>Not really? I mean if you ask people to explain the 10 endings to Inside that's just the computer doing what computers do. the point is that humans routinely

>Not really? I mean if you ask people to explain the 10 endings to Inside that's just the computer doing what computers do. the point is that humans routinely and confidently state their opinion as fact, any online forum will demonstrate that. >as accurately as it can according to it's training data, and that is it's major flaw. so we teach people that they need to be discerning with the way they use the tool. Kids in elementary school are taught that generally trust runs from : personal blog -> .com -> .org -> .gov -> .edu At this point ChatGPT sits around the "personal blog" level of trust. As long as people use the tool with this in mind then it's just business as usual.