ux-app

9 ms·

31.
by ux-app 3y ago
a 4 year old would fail at this task. does a 4 year old have intelligence?
32.
by ux-app 3y ago
>That's something that a machine will never have. hehe, this is typical goal post moving. never is a long time.
33.
by ux-app 3y ago
>Chatgpt is a stochastic word correlation machine it seems humans might be too...? my son is 4. when he was 2, I told him I love him. he clearly did not understand the concept or reciprocate. I reinforced the word with actions that felt
34.
by ux-app 4y ago
walks like a duck, quacks like a duck etc. i've laughed out loud at lots of GPT output and find it more engaging than most wetware next token generators.
35.
by ux-app 4y ago
everyone is incompetent but me!
36.
by ux-app 4y ago
https://ai.googleblog.com/2022/11/characterizing-emergent-ph...
37.
by ux-app 4y ago
have you read this[1]? >It is definitely not reasoning at all read the paper. GPT4 is the real deal. [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.12712.pdf
38.
by ux-app 4y ago
>Chess is fundamentally a different kind of problem. irrelevant. my whole world view changed when I read https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.12712.pdf now pair that with a larger memory, backtracking/revising and on-the
39.
by ux-app 4y ago
seems you're getting unnecessarily hung up on the "how" of it. planes fly but not like birds. does it matter from an "object moved from point A to B through the air" point of view? not really. LLMs are kind of the s
40.
by ux-app 4y ago
as the kids say these days: you need to touch grass my dude :)
41.
by ux-app 4y ago
60s is a great time to jump buckets. Kids grown up. No debt if you're lucky and possibly some decent passive income. 30-50 is hard, primarily due to obligations you can't just walk away from. Your mortgage drains $Xk/month an
42.
by ux-app 4y ago
how did you reach those conclusions?
43.
by ux-app 4y ago
amazingly, your comment will eventually be added to the CHatGPT corpus and at some point down the line may be used to add the nuance that's currently lacking :)
44.
by ux-app 4y ago
>I've actually used ChatGPT and copilot and I can tell you it's not even 10% more productive Use your imagination. Do you think that LLMs have hit their plateau? Not likely I'd say. With all the billions suddenly rushing i
45.
by ux-app 4y ago
>It's meaningful with respect to the claim that LLMs exhibit emergent behavior in the same way in which Game of Life does. I said it's amazing in __similar__ ways to Conway's Game of Life. i.e. a system which behaves in un
46.
by ux-app 4y ago
did you read the article? emergent behavior in this context is defined as: "emergent abilities, which we define as abilities that are not present in small models but are present in larger models" >The emergent behavior of Conwa
47.
by ux-app 4y ago
:)
48.
by ux-app 4y ago
>However it is still just pattern matching the visual cortex in your brain is also "just a pattern matching" system. guess it's not very impressive by your standard. This[1] isn't my example (it's from another HN
49.
by ux-app 4y ago
this [1] should get you started. [1] https://ai.googleblog.com/2022/11/characterizing-emergent-ph...
50.
by ux-app 4y ago
>I guess I still don't see your main point though. . . . >You are definitely right that most code is banal and glue looks like you did see my main point.
51.
by ux-app 4y ago
>i'm curious what you think is worthy of humans to do? whatever it is, it ain't making websites. >what do you then distinguish as enlightened pursuits painting your garage is getting pretty close to it I think.
52.
by ux-app 4y ago
what's your point?
53.
by ux-app 4y ago
you've got to be joking mate. >Google has “understood” English queries you can't, with a straight face, be comparing a Google search to what ChatGPT is doing. C'mon man. >In many cases it’s wrong. In many cases the resu
54.
by ux-app 4y ago
>Yet I am still skeptical AI can assemble assets and html from scratch :) the skepticism and the general dismissive tone on HN baffles me. you're talking to a computer in English ffs and it not only understands you, it goes away a
55.
by ux-app 4y ago
for every programmer working on cutting edge creative/systems/math heavy code there are 1000 gluing APIs and tapping out glorified CRUD apps. let's not pretend it's otherwise.
56.
by ux-app 4y ago
>If you work for a large company most of your day is spent understanding domain specific problems then executing on that. ... which involves fetching some data, displaying it, maybe doing some basic arithmetic and then shuffling it off t
57.
by ux-app 4y ago
>Coding involve care and inspiration give it a rest mate. Most coding is garbage generic gluing of boilerplate and API calls. Aligning buttons and agonizing over 18px vs 20px padding is a monumental waste of human capital. 99.999% of cod
58.
by ux-app 4y ago
>We'll be flooded by SEO'd to hell garbage, propaganda and deep fakes the web is already almost completely corrupted by SEO'd to hell garbage.
59.
by ux-app 4y ago
also, I don't think the same card rule is actually enforced by the system. I've always just nodded along and presented whatever card I had with me and returns always went through without an issue.
60.
by ux-app 4y ago
my 8 year old would fail at your puzzle. is an 8 year old capable of "actual reasoning"? this[1] was an interesting read. Particularly the 'Emergent Prompting Strategies' and 'chain-of-thought prompting'. I th

More ›