urda

43 ms·

541.
by urda 9y ago
What are you talking about? Google bends over backwards to support China. I would hope that this comment is not informing you for the first time that the Great Firewall [1] exists and Google China [2] happily complies just like Apple, tha
542.
by urda 9y ago
> But sure, that makes the content wrong, or something. If your own Nginx server cannot serve up a proper and protected session, why should I consider what you've written on the website? Actually how can I know that what I'm
543.
by urda 9y ago
iPhones and Apple have demonstrated that privacy is a top concern for their users. Google and their Pixel devices, not so much.
544.
by urda 9y ago
Mozilla is one of the few groups on the internet I'm proud to support. Keep up the good fight!
545.
by urda 9y ago
This is a terrible interview question. It is an unrealistic scenario, should never be in production code, and does not offer any additional information from the candidate. Please never ask this on any interview loop, thanks.
546.
by urda 9y ago
> Importantly, to become relaxed and happy again without the feeling to have to become more and more productive or create legacy for ourselves or the ones we love is yet another even more difficult step. I still deal with this problem da
547.
by urda 9y ago
> I think he's just pointing out the irony of someone purporting to aid the security-conscious having an expired cert on his own site. This is exactly the point I was going after. It would be one thing if the cert had just expired b
548.
by urda 9y ago
> Your connection is not secure > > SEC_ERROR_EXPIRED_CERTIFICATE (expired October 31, 2017) Doesn't make me want to listen to any website claiming to "fix firefox" when they can't even bother to kee
549.
by urda 9y ago
It's really hard for me to feel bad for them at all. China loves to: - Spy, eavesdrop wherever they can. Forcing vendors to turn over server controls to them. - Constantly duplicate, steal other companies work. - Create unfair advantag
550.
by urda 9y ago
Got it, must have not done that to start with!
551.
by urda 9y ago
Can tabs not be renamed?
552.
by urda 9y ago
Your point? Write slow javascript, get slow programs. It's not a crazy concept. Edit: typo
553.
by urda 9y ago
> A lot of music was removed Citations please. > They added really bad limits, like a limit on how many hours you could listen every month. Just wrong. > They forced you to create Facebook accounts to register Also completely wrong
554.
by urda 9y ago
Nope, never let them see it. Those algorithms are key to your success. Unless they are buying your company and are doing due diligence.
555.
by urda 9y ago
Just another fine example of why gizmodo is an awful news outlet.
556.
by urda 9y ago
This is great news! The Django project is such a wonderful project, I've enjoyed working with it over the years.
557.
by urda 9y ago
The OP said they had not forgotten AT&T violated net neutrality, and then used that as one of the points for moving to T-Mobile which also violated net neutrality . Either OP didn't know (which is fine) or didn't care but wan
558.
by urda 9y ago
> Likewise, you knew what he meant. Clearly not, and here's why: - I would have expected someone who knows that the major carriers all have something to gain from this Decembers vote not to list that as a reason. Listing that as a r
559.
by urda 9y ago
> Interesting, you presume to know what network they are using now Crazy thought, but perhaps I based it on their comment that simply said: > It's one of the multitude of reasons I left for T-Mobile. Which, in most educated circl
560.
by urda 9y ago
Interesting, you swapped one telecom who violates net neutrality for yet another telecom who violates net neutrality. [1] [2] I wouldn't be tooting that horn too loudly. We need legal protections, not good feelings from these carriers
561.
by urda 9y ago
Your insurance carrier will not care what the other driver should have been doing, if you rear end someone you are at FAULT as you failed to keep a safe distance from the car in front of you. It doesn't matter if they slow or stop fo
562.
by urda 9y ago
> It is the persons fault for not rear ending a vehicle, its also the first drivers responsibility to drive responsibly (i.e. not braking or stopping for things that are imaginary) Pitch this line to your insurance company if you ever en
563.
by urda 9y ago
Up for me.
564.
by urda 9y ago
I have multiple citations there for starters, and clearly you didn't read any of them. > You've just made ad hominem attacks against me, and an assertion about what may happen in the future, with zero reasoning. Not at all, not
565.
by urda 9y ago
It's rare to see someone so bought-in to the noise and lies that Ajit Pai is spewing here on HN, usually a more educated user base but nonetheless let's jump right in and counteract this bad comment. First of all, the Patriot Act
566.
by urda 9y ago
It absolutely is relevant, let's take a moment and review the key point: > I can guarantee you Google protects this data more securely than your carrier does Part of acting as a company who cares about user's data includes not
567.
by urda 9y ago
> I can guarantee you Google protects this data more securely than your carrier does. This sentence is completely insane in this context, did we read the same article? Google should not have access to this data, and it sure as hell s
568.
by urda 9y ago
It kind of already is. Talent is up and moving to other tech hubs out of SF. Might be a bit too late.
569.
by urda 9y ago
Same here! I love their tech and I can't wait to see Model 3 after Model 3. ... but damn it Tesla ship it!
570.
by urda 9y ago
I could be wrong, and this play could totally pan out. But their current Model S, X, and 3 aren't exactly flooding the market either.

More ›