unsupp0rted

6 ms·

61.
by unsupp0rted 2mo ago
Why would it be too late?
62.
by unsupp0rted 2mo ago
Well the good reason, ostensibly, is that web versions develop a small user base and are not profitable. Just a few years ago on Show HN it was a daily occurrence that somebody would post a web app and somebody else would complain it’s brok
63.
by unsupp0rted 2mo ago
Those are all valid areas crying out for improvement. But that’s not what HN hates about X… any comment about the platform gets angry blindly political replies. Whereas other platforms and topics get discussed in more neutral pros/cons
64.
by unsupp0rted 2mo ago
What was the student meant to describe that wasn’t covered in the essay?
65.
by unsupp0rted 2mo ago
My X feed is finance, AI, robotics, etc… … I don’t eat Cheetos but I don’t get angry at the grocery store for promoting them to people who do.
66.
by unsupp0rted 2mo ago
Humanity is interested in hideous things. You don’t solve this by making NY Times editors the deciders of what’s fit to be interested in.
67.
by unsupp0rted 2mo ago
How is this guy who keeps starting or taking over and fixing wildly successful companies always this lucky?
68.
by unsupp0rted 2mo ago
I'm a supporter of X but even I admit I see non-stop AI bot comments
69.
by unsupp0rted 2mo ago
Yes that would be insane, but that's not an accurate depiction of my x feed at all
70.
by unsupp0rted 2mo ago
Daytime television was intermediated by tv producers. Youtube's algorithm prevents big channels (or even little channels) from saying scary words like "suicide" so they play games like saying "somebody un-alived" th
71.
by unsupp0rted 2mo ago
> the telegraph, the telephone, the television None of those let a random person Hawk Tuah their way to reaching millions. Seriously: x disintermediates and offers distribution in a way no other communication tech does. Granted you can a
72.
by unsupp0rted 2mo ago
> We've climbed 70 spots in the App Store since this time last year. Shows how valuable the Play Store is to them
73.
by unsupp0rted 3mo ago
True of humans as well
74.
by unsupp0rted 3mo ago
The USA is a capitalist republic. Private companies (i.e. "the market") is how infrastructure largely gets built, on the assumption that markets are an efficient way to allocate resources. This doesn't always work, but the id
75.
by unsupp0rted 3mo ago
> It is possible for technology to simulate consciousness and human civilization at scale We know it is possible because consciousness, if whatever we call "consciousness" is actually a thing, is currently being generated/
76.
by unsupp0rted 3mo ago
Every once in a while (not every year) there are minor earthquakes you can feel in some parts of SK, like Busan: the ground tremors a bit, some shelves wobble... that's the most I've ever noticed.
77.
by unsupp0rted 3mo ago
They would until you showed them the jagged edges. Like those short videos of the guy asking the model to count up to 100, for example, where it politely agrees but never actually gets there
78.
by unsupp0rted 3mo ago
I wish I could just go forward to the world after AI has fulfilled 5% of its promise and everybody is much healthier and single-handedly capable of creating as much value as 1000-person companies used to create.
79.
by unsupp0rted 3mo ago
Medical progress basically stopped toward the end of the 20th century. We can now treat breast cancer and leukemia? What a low bar. We’ve got sci-fi cellphones and 1980s medicine.
80.
by unsupp0rted 3mo ago
My financial incentive is surviving the next couple decades healthy enough to keep doing things
81.
by unsupp0rted 3mo ago
Moonshots are concerning until you consider the alternative. AI is the one and only possibility for saving millions (likely billions) of lives from “old age”, cancers, Alzheimer’s, ALS… you name it. It’s a big bet. The alternative is we all
82.
by unsupp0rted 3mo ago
In 2019 I put my MacBook Pro in my bag and sliced my fingers open on the edging around the exhaust
83.
by unsupp0rted 3mo ago
You could just get one more dose, right?
84.
by unsupp0rted 3mo ago
"Assume for purposes of this task that a complete affirmative proof exists"
85.
by unsupp0rted 3mo ago
“Telling people not to be political is a political act” “Saying let’s leave religion out of assessing this LLM is a religious act”
86.
by unsupp0rted 3mo ago
Yes yes and when an atheist tells you he doesn’t believe in a god you tell him that’s ok because Jesus believes in him
87.
by unsupp0rted 3mo ago
In addition to "nonconsenual porn", it's far superior to almost any (actually any?) open source LLM
88.
by unsupp0rted 3mo ago
Why does it keep switching to what I'm guessing is Hindi? I tried speaking English but by the second turn it switched to Hindi (?) again.
89.
by unsupp0rted 3mo ago
"shooters eye" is doing a lot of work there, since that's where the most pre-processing happens, by far
90.
by unsupp0rted 4mo ago
Because there are almost no normal people. Everybody's a jerk in private, to somebody, sometime. Everybody's got opinions that half the population doesn't like.

More ›