undecisive

41 ms·

301.
by undecisive 8y ago
I guess the argument is that if the only difference between two "robots" is the gender of their intended audience, and one gets banned, then that's prejudice. Along the same lines as, if the only difference between two people
302.
by undecisive 8y ago
To summon = To request to appear; send for. Surely the only difference - from a UK perspective - is that one is a court, appointed (mumble mumble) by the Queen, and the other is the government, appointed (mumble mumble) by the Queen. So yes
303.
by undecisive 8y ago
I feel like this is appropriate here: https://xkcd.com/1425/ Or do you have an idea how you would programmatically determine whether input was not echoed due to password, game, or just so that the app can do some pre-p
304.
by undecisive 8y ago
Thanks for the blog post - it has opened my eyes to something dokku can do - I didn't even consider looking at it from that angle! For me, the down side is flexibility. If I have a single project that I'm working on that pays all
305.
by undecisive 8y ago
Agreed. As someone currently moving my infrastructure to Dokku, where I have legacy apps on a range of ruby and non-rubies, this approach isn't scalable for my needs. That said, I wonder if there is a middle ground - where we can use t
306.
by undecisive 8y ago
I'm glad I'm not the only person who found this surprising. Withholding payment until a threshold is reached would make some sense, though for some packages they might be waiting years. Another approach might be to reserve some ki
307.
by undecisive 8y ago
> There's no ceiling on how much a package earns. There is a floor, however: if the payment computation arrives at a trivial total for a package, we reassign the money to other packages. It's impractical to pay very low amounts
308.
by undecisive 9y ago
Same on Vivaldi and Google Chrome on Mac (Sierra, 10.12.6)
309.
by undecisive 9y ago
Interesting approach. I did something similar a while back, took a more function-based approach: https://github.com/undecided/tg At that point, I hadn't really done much react-style apps - will have to see how wel
310.
by undecisive 9y ago
Well... unless you use something like gitlab https://about.gitlab.com/ - which is also free, and has support for issues, CI, etc. (snap!)
311.
Sim-free iphone? Don't insert an EE sim card(ee.response.lithium.com)
15 points by undecisive 12y ago|12 comments
312.
by undecisive 12y ago
Do you think it would be rude of us to add duckie.me to the list of external links? :)
313.
by undecisive 12y ago
I'm gonna call that a success! Did you ever get to the bottom of your pizza-eating trauma?
314.
by undecisive 12y ago
Well, if we're doing farmyard animals, fesuffolk can I suggest "Gets my goat!"... which, obviously, bleats out programming antipatterns? I'm sure we can modulate the JS text-to-speech appropriately...
315.
by undecisive 12y ago
One of the constraints we gave ourselves was that we wanted a fully in-browser solution, and transparently secure - no server-side backend, therefore no data protection issues. With that in mind, any training we did would have to be done by
316.
by undecisive 13y ago
Questioning the norm is not ridiculous. Imposing your norms on society is. I agree completely with chrissnell, if your end user considers it an important part of their name, status and identity, who the hell are you to decide differently?
317.
by undecisive 13y ago
You're missing the point. The people of a vastly different culture may not wish to be differentiated based on their gender or marital status, but people of a certain generation take it as a point of pride, being "Mrs" or &quo
318.
Social networks are not the future for website marketing and SEO(norfolktechjournal.com)
2 points by undecisive 13y ago|0 comments
319.
by undecisive 13y ago
I'm not sure you quite understand the concept of "public". It's a specialised search engine. It aggregates public data, data you have said the world should see, and presents it in a form that a particular userbase might
320.
by undecisive 13y ago
Because everyone adores Microsoft, and is horrified and gutted that such a useful and loved addition to the internet ecosphere, backed by such an understaffed and money-starved corporation could be hindered by such a tragedy. And because ev
321.
by undecisive 13y ago
According to their FAQs, they do plan to implement chip and pin (EMV) in future devices. Not sure how - I would be shocked if EMV could be tricked into exposing cryptographic secrets. Mind, regarding skimming, the FAQs also say "You ca
322.
by undecisive 14y ago
Maybe because DuckDuckGo differentiates themselves better. Microsoft is more of the same - maybe marginally better in one respect (allowing opt-out) but atrocious in many others - almost every article I've seen has had no trouble balancing
323.
by undecisive 14y ago
tl;dr Probably unhashed or project manager. There is a very unlikely security scenario, where the hash of the password actually forms a dictionary word (or combination of dictionary words). I did say it was very unlikely (astronomically so)