unanswered

41 ms·

361.
by unanswered 6y ago
Isn't this a good thing, since it's correcting for an historical inequity?
362.
by unanswered 6y ago
And do what, shoot both x86 feet they're standing on? If they wanted to optimize technical/engineering success, it's absolutely the best move. But to optimize shareholder value or anything like it, it's impossible.
363.
by unanswered 6y ago
That article is very homophobic and you probably shouldn't be citing it. It's pretending that the only porn that exists is depicting women.
364.
by unanswered 6y ago
> it's used by an extremist group. If you have a legitimate source for this (i.e., not probably citogenesis https://xkcd.com/978/ ) I'd be very interested. As far as I can tell this was essentially made-up
365.
by unanswered 6y ago
If BLM isn't the face of the justice reform movement, then why is the capitol riot the face of the "the election was stolen" movement?
366.
by unanswered 6y ago
No no, you see, when a scientismist/materialist believes something, that makes it true . Unlike when anyone else believes anything! What else is "truth" supposed to mean?
367.
by unanswered 6y ago
The birthday example is evidence against 1-based indexes, not for them: on the birthday when you're turning "1", it's your second visit to that date. Your first visit to the date of your birth, you're "0&qu
368.
by unanswered 6y ago
Whenever I'm changing jobs, I spend at least half my time worried sick that I'm being scammed somehow. Until now, the "rational" part of my mind thought this was very silly, but I think this goes to show that it's a
369.
by unanswered 6y ago
I posted some examples in sibling comments, and the response was that leftist calls for violence are actually secret code about carnival games. So I'm not particularly inclined to post more.
370.
by unanswered 6y ago
Can you show me where "whack-a-mole" is mentioned in the original comment? It's something that exists only in your mind to excuse a call for murder. "Singular target changes the context". Okay, so "Man, Hitler
371.
by unanswered 6y ago
Can you show me where on this page "whack" is defined as a reference to a childrens' game? https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/whack Because all I see is "murder". Look how far you will stretch to d
372.
by unanswered 6y ago
"We really need to whack Joe Biden before he becomes president!" That's okay, right? Because it's just a children's game, right? Or is it interpreted differently depending on who the target is? Nazis, whacking them
373.
by unanswered 6y ago
See what I mean? There's always an excuse for leftist calls for violence; whereas right-wing calls for peace like Trump's recent tweets are akshually dogwhistles for violence. I'm disgusted. It just jumps so easily to your
374.
by unanswered 6y ago
"I vote we whack as many Nazis as we can." https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25749435 Took me about 30 seconds to find. But in general I will not do unpaid moderation work for ideological crusaders like dang. F
375.
by unanswered 6y ago
Or you turned a blind eye, subconciously perhaps, because they're acting on behalf of your tribe.
376.
by unanswered 6y ago
> I've read posts inviting people to hang and quarter democrats on the streets in front of their families, as well as posts inviting armed sedition against the institutions. And I've read posts on HN saying we should hang and
377.
by unanswered 6y ago
This was not a balanced perspective at all. It gets various verifiable facts entirely wrong. For example, it claims "senators [] would break laws governing U.S. elections", presumably referring to objecting to results. But not onl
378.
by unanswered 6y ago
That's what I don't get. I looked through the available documentation briefly and didn't see any mention that this is intended to be a `mrustc`; it really seems to want to be a `rustc`. I'm not aware of other GCC fronten
379.
by unanswered 6y ago
The video games example seems consistent to me; we regularly italicize the names of plays (for example) but not the names of tools and businesses.
380.
by unanswered 6y ago
It also looks rather incomplete. Are they not planning on implementing borrowck? If chalk/polonius were ready and had a C API the roadmap would begin to make sense.
381.
by unanswered 6y ago
So it appears that as of now, general warrants are disallowed in the UK and (in practice) permitted in the US. America's founding fathers are spinning in their graves.
382.
by unanswered 6y ago
This and subsequent pages disappointingly fail to explain the general solution to the deadlock problem. They present a specific instance of Dijkstra's general solution but I don't think they give a fully convincing explanation of