uh_uh

11 ms·

91.
by uh_uh 2y ago
These guys are clearly at least somewhat intelligent and have brought up arguments in the past that I, in my infinite wisdom, haven’t considered. It’s up to me whether I take those arguments onboard after a sufficient amount of research. So
92.
by uh_uh 2y ago
I think it’s possible to create 2 dating profiles with the same pictures and change occupation only. It doesn’t have to be real to measure the impact of occupation.
93.
by uh_uh 2y ago
You can't just arbitrarily change (confounding) variables like that for a proper experiment. All other factors (including physique) must remain the same while you change one thing only: occupation.
94.
by uh_uh 2y ago
Think of all the menial stuff you must perform regardless of experience level. E.g. you change the return type of a function and now you have to unpack the results slightly differently. Traditional automated tools fail at this. But if you s
95.
by uh_uh 2y ago
> They don't have high status even today Try putting on a dating website that you work at Google vs you work in agriculture and tell us which yielded more dates.
96.
by uh_uh 2y ago
Why did the schizophrenia become less common according to this theory?
97.
by uh_uh 2y ago
Quite often, yes. That's why I prefer integration tests.
98.
by uh_uh 2y ago
Apple has invested $95M, and missing $14.75M. So they have reached 86% of the 40% target. Based on this logic, 34% of the iPhone 16 was sourced from Indonesia? Not trying to be snarky, I'm probably misunderstanding this. Sidenote: this
99.
by uh_uh 2y ago
> The tanh smashing function just makes sure nothing can blow up into large numbers and all outputs are in a range of less than 1. That's not the main point even though it probably helps. As OkayPhysicist said above, without a nonli
100.
by uh_uh 2y ago
> That's the only non-linearity I'm aware of. "only" is doing a lot work here because that non-linearity is enough to vastly expand the landscape of functions that an NN can approximate. If the NN was linear, you coul
101.
by uh_uh 2y ago
What does a low level wizard need to know more specifically?
102.
by uh_uh 2y ago
Say more please.
103.
by uh_uh 2y ago
The fact that he's a solo dev giving his project away for free (even for a limited time) is a good enough reason.
104.
by uh_uh 2y ago
I don't think there's such a thing as key frames here, just frames. And if you run SD through every frame, the output will be janky because SD doesn't know about temporal coherence.
105.
by uh_uh 2y ago
I'd be really interested in reliable info about the gender ratio on Math Group apps. Also how their matching/scoring algo works. There must have been at least one ex engineer who leaked something.
106.
by uh_uh 2y ago
I thought the creator of Deno, Ryan Dahl, is also the creator of NodeJS. So by your reasoning, the development of Deno should go faster than Bun's, no?
107.
by uh_uh 2y ago
Normies won't use these. UX needs to be simple.
108.
by uh_uh 2y ago
Does that actually work?
109.
by uh_uh 2y ago
NCC is really terrifying. There's no real prophylaxis methods for humans AFAIK. However, the disease should be eradicable now by vaccination of pigs. If not everywhere, at least certain countries. For example Madagascar is among the wo
110.
by uh_uh 2y ago
As a counterpoint to that, I grew up in a blue-collar family under modest circumstances and I still feel like bigcorp software development is soul-crushing. Surely, you appreciate it for a while. But eventually the reality of it sets in, an
111.
by uh_uh 2y ago
Same applies to Apple terminating legitimate developer accounts and thus destroying livelihoods.
112.
by uh_uh 3y ago
Accurately or the way humans do it?
113.
by uh_uh 3y ago
Not in my experience. Sonnet gets to the point quicker, but hallucinates more than GPT4. I'm keen to try Opus.
114.
by uh_uh 3y ago
What's so irresponsible about it? He clearly communicated the state of affairs. I think he was generous enough with his time for creating the library in the first place and posting this update. It's not like he's owing anythi
115.
by uh_uh 3y ago
Because the human talent will not have many alternatives left in this scenario. So far they could stay in the technical lane, now they will be forced into AI-management.
116.
by uh_uh 3y ago
I only tried GPT4 but it has a way better command of language than many people I know and I include myself in that. If GPT4 doesn't understand language, then I don't either.
117.
by uh_uh 3y ago
Would you apply the same line of reasoning to flying? That branch of engineering had a huge amount of detractors too who were confidently right until they weren't. My point is, no one knows how close we are to AGI. Taking the sceptical
118.
by uh_uh 3y ago
Did you really see 5 years ago that we will have talking computers now that understand when you speak to them? I certainly haven't. What GPT-4 is now has been squarely in sci-fi realm for many people.
119.
by uh_uh 3y ago
Aren't there some fundamental issues with the Max regarding its engine placement which necessitated the MCAS system that was responsible for the two fatal crashes? If that's true, I don't think the Max can be as safe as a pla
120.
by uh_uh 3y ago
Do you not think that AI has been doing quite a lot of "actually coming into existence" the past decade? Did we have computers 10 years ago that could beat the best humans at Go, generate photorealistic images or converse in natur

More ›