6 ms·
I only tried GPT4 but it has a way better command of language than many people I know and I include myself in that. If GPT4 doesn't understand language, then I
by uh_uh 3y ago
I only tried GPT4 but it has a way better command of language than many people I know and I include myself in that. If GPT4 doesn't understand language, then I don't either.
- aredox 3y agoDoes MS Word "understand language" because of autocorrect?
- ALittleLight 3y agoCan autocorrect hold a conversation, write code or poetry, answer or pose riddles, summarize text, write novel stories, diagnose medical issues, comprehend diagrams, etc?
- DrFalkyn 3y agoELIZA could do that 50 years ago. I haven't been really impressed with ChatGPT. It basically seems like a more useful search engine.
- atleastoptimal 3y agoAre you using GPT 3.5 or GPT-4? And how are you using it? What queries are you giving it?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- xcv123 3y agoELIZA had no ability to translate language, summarize text, generate poetry or anything like that. Extremely idiotic comparison.
- EnergyAmy 3y agoComparing LLMs to ELIZA shows that you understand neither.
- aredox 3y agoText summarisation routinely hallucinates, code fails outside of boilerplate, and poetry is literally the least coherent form of writing. And no, AI can't diagnose yet - even expert systems forty years ago did better and it wasn't good enough.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- xcv123 3y ago> Text summarisation routinely hallucinates LLMs are trained to summarize text with extremely high accuracy. There is no confabulation of text summarized within the context window. Confabulation only occurs with facts recalled from outside of the context window, which is not a text summarization task. Same goes for human memory. Ironically you have hallucinated a "fact" about LLMs.
- xcv123 3y agoDeep learning is not autocorrect
- EnergyAmy 3y agoA sufficiently advanced autocorrect requires understanding language as well as a human. MS Word's autocorrect is not that advanced. I don't understand why people think that this argument is worth bringing up.