u801e

75 ms·

751.
by u801e 6y ago
The rest of the fourth amendment says: >> and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. I'm n
752.
by u801e 6y ago
I think the solution is to rely on hanging indents rather than trying to align with the column of the previous opening parenthesis, bracket, etc. So instead of this: def some_method(param1 param2): statement1
753.
by u801e 6y ago
> A simple line in the summary -h gives that says: For more information, read the man page: man foo Interestingly enough, GNU utilities include a message in each man page that tells you to run info <cmd> for more detailed informati
754.
by u801e 6y ago
> So, how do search every public channel, regardless of whether you were even a part of the company at the time, with as convenient of a workflow as Slack has? How likely is that scenario? Chat is far less organized compared to email or
755.
by u801e 6y ago
Is this the case if you have Thunderbird set to view message body as plain text?
756.
by u801e 6y ago
> Thunderbird renders untrusted HTML content and therefore is subject to a steady stream of CVEs and must stay absolutely up-to-date with Gecko Thunderbird will prompt the user to decide whether they want to render remote content. I&#x2
757.
by u801e 6y ago
I'm not sure whether Thunderbird would meet your criteria, but there are a number of keyboard bindings and it can handle HTML messages reasonably well (especially if you set the view option to plain text).
758.
by u801e 6y ago
> This seems somehow wild to me. Why don't other email apps use the appropriate header fields? Why do they even try to use the subject field? Why do they insist on quoting the whole thread text below the message body? Why not do all
759.
by u801e 6y ago
> The important point is that CLs are atomic (and are reviewed atomically) even if they depend upon each other (i.e. are a part of a stack). What prevents a situation like CL2 getting approved and merged prior to the resolution of CL1?
760.
by u801e 6y ago
At my place of work, we've sort of implemented that feature by using fixup or squash commits. That is, if a comment is made on a diff line in a PR, use git blame to determine which commit was responsible for that line of code, update
761.
by u801e 6y ago
> about comment on the commit message I'd say it's a commit on the main PR Except that if the overall diff line I choose to comment on about the commit message changes in some way, then the comment is collapsed, which makes it
762.
by u801e 6y ago
> Collapsing comments when the code changes is the correct thing to do 90% of the time in my experience Why not just leave them uncollapsed and allow one to mark them as resolved when the change is actually resolved. The other problem i
763.
by u801e 6y ago
Github PRs (at least on the enterprise version) still have the problem of collapsing comments where the associated line of code changed in some way that had nothing to do with the comment. They also require a lot of scrolling if the overal
764.
by u801e 6y ago
> The hospital I work for will pay me time and a half to come in after hours and do anything that needs done (moving patients, feeding patients, cleaning rooms), and I'm in IT. I think it's more along the lines that it's p
765.
by u801e 6y ago
> Taliban were not in a position to be asking for anything If they weren't, then the US military wouldn't still be in Afghanistan dealing with them nearly 20 years later.
766.
by u801e 6y ago
That may explain the way the media is framing the trip withdrawals from Afghanistan but not asking why we still have trips stationed there after nearly 20 years.
767.
by u801e 6y ago
> As I recall, the Taliban refused to hand over bin Laden and disavow Al Qaeda, which is why they were invaded. My recollection was that the Taliban asked for evidence of Osama Bin Laden's involvement in the September 11th attacks.
768.
by u801e 6y ago
If you want the code to run 24/7, and you want engineers available to fix it, then you hire people to work off hour shifts and pay them more. You don't hire someone to work 9 am to 5 pm Monday to Friday and expect them to wake up
769.
by u801e 6y ago
> his has nothing to do with security and everything to do with banning tools like youtube-dl, wget and others Exactly. What's insecure about an application that can establish a secure connection using an accepted version of TLS an
770.
by u801e 6y ago
> Any thread where the discussion isn't expected to splinter into subtopics But most longer running discussions will splinter into subtopics. If the discussion is short enough, the way it's displayed doesn't really matter
771.
by u801e 6y ago
> And it was also super easy to filter out idiots, without anyone moderating the stuff. That's one thing I've found lacking in practically any single forum out there. IMO, client side moderation is the best kind of moderation.
772.
by u801e 6y ago
I guess it depends on the forum. On usenet, many threads would last for weeks, if not months. The reader I used (Thunderbird and its ancestors) would sort threads based on which one had the most recent reply. Given the indexed view of th
773.
by u801e 6y ago
> Tree-style comments are not the best format for every type of discussion. I've found that they work well for discussions where there are several subtopics. Under what scenerio would this format not be considered the best format?
774.
by u801e 6y ago
> I'm not aware of two-factor authentication for SMTP or IMAP. This could be achieved using a client side TLS certificate along with a username and password. I know that Postfix and Dovecot support it.
775.
by u801e 6y ago
> Think about vim: it is cryptic, does everything different than everything else out there , but it gives you something in return. The same could be said about git. For example, branching and merging is far better with it compared to pr
776.
by u801e 6y ago
> The underlying technology of git is great, but the UX is terrible. I think it really comes down to a difference in philosophy in terms of learning how to use tools. In the past, one had to read the documentation to figure out how to u
777.
by u801e 6y ago
> So I can only sign into my account from any new machine if I have access to a previously-signed-in device? The scenario I'm envisioning is that one creates an account on a website like HN, but with the additional step of generatin
778.
by u801e 6y ago
> Your average user is not going to open a command prompt and dig into Openssl. That's why I said that the browser should provide that feature. > There are (or were, I haven't used them for a decade) browser-specific APIs fo
779.
by u801e 6y ago
> I would assume that behind the scenes that the service is restricting what ports that password can be used on Assuming it's a device accessing the service over IMAP and SMTP that can access multiple networks, restricting by IP and
780.
by u801e 6y ago
I don't understand how that's any more secure than just using a strong password for the account. At some point, you're going to have to make that password accessible to the client. Plus, it's arguably less secure becau

More ›