ty6853

50 ms·

901.
by ty6853 2y ago
Well back in the early 20th century I'm afraid that was mostly what was available to discriminated minorities. It's not just theory, it goes back to railroadmen being pissed blacks were undercutting them. They could not just out
902.
by ty6853 2y ago
Go back further. Minimums were applied to the railroad in 1909, pulling them up to the prevailing white wage when the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen became enraged blacks were working for cheaper.
903.
by ty6853 2y ago
Not sure. I lost about 4 months of work, rest was time where I didn't have other work offered to me so the opportunity cost was 0. But consider if I hired someone, I would lose 30% of my earnings to taxes. And then 50% of what I pay
904.
by ty6853 2y ago
Same with minimum wage. Whites were tired of blacks underbidding them, so they just outlawed their jobs by making unskilled labor valued below X illegal.
905.
by ty6853 2y ago
Board differences in medical field have been interesting to watch. For instance NP and PA have very similar skills, but the nursing board goes to bat for nurses allowing independent practice while doctors have chosen in some states to sabot
906.
by ty6853 2y ago
I bypassed trades and engineering licensing to build my house, which is usually only legally possible if you do basically everything yourself ( at least in my state diy work and even owner/builder amateur structural engineering is exem
907.
by ty6853 2y ago
Meanwhile go on oddysee or irc and people are 3d printing guns on a days unskilled laborer wages of tools and another days wages of materials, while discussing anarchist theory or materials science. Some of them even using such technology
908.
by ty6853 2y ago
We've had since FDR to try and curb the post WW2 federal hyper expansion. Regulations keep growing, our prison population reaches one of the highest rates in world, and we get vanishingly little infrastructure or other benefits for th
909.
by ty6853 2y ago
Democracy is 'good' mainly because it represents a vote of who would win a violent fight, and anticipating that, we can bypass all that and just defer to the victors without bloodshed. As means of violence becomes less equal amon
910.
by ty6853 2y ago
The US has a progressive income taxation so they've counterbalanced that through taxing the balance ultimately via inflation,which is regressive against the cash based poor.
911.
by ty6853 2y ago
The most reliable way that has been found is to make everyone poor. Once disposable resources appear someone always becomes a more shrewd trader, even if means if production is otherwise equal. Then they trade those things for a greater s
912.
by ty6853 2y ago
Im suggesting doing different non-analogous things can provide balance. At no point did I assert they must be analogous nor am I obliged to prove your own assumptions.
913.
by ty6853 2y ago
My claim is that symmetric behavior is balanced. You went on the goose chase dismissing the first example of your entirely different demand, then pretended I never said it. Your argument is a disingenuous fraud.
914.
by ty6853 2y ago
No it's not normal. What is normal is say congress and bankers meeting in secret under assumed identities on an (Jakyll) island to create institutions like the federal reserve that 'eases' massive inflation in while purpose
915.
by ty6853 2y ago
I haven't said it was analogous though, it was your invented demand.
916.
by ty6853 2y ago
A federal employee under USDS
917.
by ty6853 2y ago
My assertion was 'the right dismantling the shadow left, and the left dismantling the shadow right hopefully provides some balance.' Not that they do it in identical ways, nor analogous ways. The demand for an analogy was a straw
918.
by ty6853 2y ago
'This' is as defined by you, as you reject analogies based on whatever premise you impose on others, even though they pretend to be mere questions. I knew you would reject whatever was offered, and you did. It was never a sincere
919.
by ty6853 2y ago
>In 1997, Horiuchi was charged with manslaughter for killing Vicki Weaver at Ruby Ridge; the charges were later dropped due to Constitutional supremacy, granting federal officers immunity from actions taken in the scope of their practice
920.
by ty6853 2y ago
Ross Ulbricht, for one.
921.
by ty6853 2y ago
The argument 'but the right dismantling the shadow left, and the left dismantling the shadow right hopefully provides some balance' is merely a symmetric balance principle. The person pretending to ask questions used an underhande
922.
by ty6853 2y ago
What's going on today with doge is what exactly? They're accessing payment systems, as advertised openly in a democratic election. You want analogies of a scrutinizing funding and then viciously calling for its retraction? Beca
923.
by ty6853 2y ago
Supremacy clause will likely protect them. Even fed lon horiuchi, charged with sniping an innocent woman with a child in her arms, was able to claim supremacy long enough the state case was too stale to win.
924.
by ty6853 2y ago
Yes that is essentially what I want but for the same reason I am not a trump supporter nor did I vote for Trump despite voting. I see him as a somewhat useful tool of chaos but I'm under no illusion he is operating under anything but p
925.
by ty6853 2y ago
As was Enron...
926.
by ty6853 2y ago
It is hard for me to imagine any entrenched civil service being cooperative with plans to shit can their jobs. So I'm not sure that means much. Almost by human nature, most people are uncooperative ( and deemed such ) with plans to e
927.
by ty6853 2y ago
A simplified view: since FDR the main difference in presidential action is whether to crank progress at 1 or 11 in the ever expanding book of regulations, favored tax nook and crannies, and various benefits plans for pay-to-play voters like
928.
by ty6853 2y ago
Judicial branch has basically no enforcement. They can judge all they like, if the other branches or even states tell them to shove it up their ass, what can they do? Not long ago Hawaii told the Supreme Court 'spirit of aloha' a
929.
by ty6853 2y ago
I think the one they're going for is that being a senior officer with material authority requires confirmation per the appointments clause, constitutional law instead of a federal statute. Whether musk is operating as such seems dubiou
930.
by ty6853 2y ago
I was assured right here on HN that the data was public to begin with, and downvoted for suggesting it was possible unseen corruption. Hopefully if that is true they find it just matches what has released publicly. https://news.

More ›