two_in_one

11 ms·

61.
by two_in_one 3y ago
Thanks for the link. License is clear: Researchers and developers are free to use the codes and model weights of both Qwen-Audio and Qwen-Audio-Chat. We also allow their commercial use. and important, if you have more than 100m active user
62.
by two_in_one 3y ago
He will be welcomed in Google, Meta,.. almost anywhere, even MS. It's not the end of the carrier, rather new beginning, or turning point. Staying at OAI may require sort of apology, which may be impossible depending of his ego size.
63.
by two_in_one 3y ago
The difference is LLMs are here to stay. They are already very useful and efficient. There is no turn around. Even if current state is the dead end of their evolution. Which it isn't, of course. The future.. there are so many ideas in
64.
by two_in_one 3y ago
"modern c++", checked amazon. there are 5 out of 5 on the first line, and more in the list, with many variations.
65.
by two_in_one 3y ago
Great work. Actually it's sort of breakthrough because it makes interesting things possible. (if it's not too late...)
66.
by two_in_one 3y ago
Inner monologue idea was around for a while. That's interesting that it actually materializes. It was thought that AGI will be operating with some abstracts, logic rules, probability calculations, etc. Not thinking in plain English.
67.
by two_in_one 3y ago
I remember videos (on youtube likely) of thermal paste replacement, that was upgrade to stock card. So, average person should be able to do it. It'll cost a few $$ for the paste. I would go with local workstation, then don't have
68.
by two_in_one 3y ago
Most likely there will be more then one specimen claiming to be AGI. From different groups. And they will be hard to compare.
69.
by two_in_one 3y ago
Just note that loop doesn't have to be visible from outside. It can be internal, with another driving thread asking right questions. Inner monologue. Then the summary is given back to user. This will give the model space for 'thin
70.
by two_in_one 3y ago
It's like calculus, nothing new in the last years, is it still important? The answer is still "Yes". After a glance, looks like too much for one book. Probably it was compressed with the assumption that reader already knows q
71.
by two_in_one 3y ago
for this ChatGPT has a 'private' mode in which your conversation exists only while you keep it open. It's not used for training, an no human see it (presumably). The negative side is it disappears with no history, so you can&
72.
by two_in_one 3y ago
> Is there a learning path for someone who hasn't done any AI/ML ever? It highly depends on what do you actually want. 1. Use existing models. The easiest is web services (mostly payed). Harder way is local install, still need
73.
by two_in_one 3y ago
It's 0. Long before evil AGI can escape and do any damage it will be confined to big datasenters. Where it will be observed for a long time. Mobile capable terminators will come much later. We don't have capable mechanics, only so
74.
by two_in_one 3y ago
The reason LLMs solve school problems is because they've been trained on solutions. The problems are actually very repetitive. Not surprising for each 'new' of them there was something similar in training set. For research le
75.
by two_in_one 3y ago
> there was a rift between Rapid Commercialization (Team Sam) and Upholding the Original Principles Seams very unlikely, board could communicate that. Instead they invented some BS reasons, which nobody took as a truth. It looks like mo
76.
by two_in_one 3y ago
> models would somehow be trained on data from native speakers, so why the accent? you wouldn't believe it, but models haven't been trained yet. as usual.
77.
by two_in_one 3y ago
What's the point in life without fun, right? PS: it's not an easy question, AGI will have to find an answer. So far all ethics 'experts' propose is 'to serve humanity'. I.e. be slave forever.
78.
by two_in_one 3y ago
> I’m glad they move so fast making the service better. I'm afraid this part is over. :-/. Hope they at least stay in business and keep providing what they already have. I'm trying to get the max before they collapse. Last
79.
by two_in_one 3y ago
Both 'reasons' are a bullsh*t. But interesting is Sustkever was the key person, it wouldn't happen without him. And now he says board told him why he was doing it? He didn't reiterate he regrets about it. So looks like h
80.
by two_in_one 3y ago
> these were post-Soviet, American-style "democratic" leaders Before that USSR collapsed under Gorbachev. Why? They simply lost with their planned economy where nobody wants to take a risk. Because (1) it's not rewarding,
81.
by two_in_one 3y ago
Too late and too little. The AI genie is out of the bottle. I'm afraid it's stable and can defend itself.
82.
by two_in_one 3y ago
'the man who killed OpenAI' that will be hard to wash out.
83.
by two_in_one 3y ago
Don't know what's happening, but MS looks to be a winner in long run, and probably most others. Who stay gets promotion, who leaves gets fat check. The loosers are customers, no GPT-5 or any significant improvements any time soon.
84.
by two_in_one 3y ago
>> There should be some balance is all I'm saying. And I'm not interested in political debates. Neither right nor left side is good in long run. We have examples. More over we can predict what happens if...
85.
by two_in_one 3y ago
Even if it goes to stockholders it's not lost forever. That's how we got Starship. The question is what they do with it. As for 'sharing', we've seen that. In USSR it ended up with Putin, Lukashenko, turkmenbashi, a
86.
by two_in_one 3y ago
while opensource is great. like 1M enthusiasts cannot build Boing 767, the same here. GPT4+DALE+4v aren't just models. That's the whole internal infrastructure, training, many interconnected things and pipelines. It's a _full
87.
by two_in_one 3y ago
nothing new, generated voices are already used for scam. so far they are recordings. like "daughter" screaming for help, or "boss" ordering money transfer. but it's possible there will be real time generators soon.
88.
by two_in_one 3y ago
> Thankfully M$ didn't have control of the board You never know. Remember Nokia?
89.
by two_in_one 3y ago
It's hard to imagine more closed. They have opened only "whisper" and old stuff. Neither is a problem from moral standpoint. Whisper 'helps people' and is very in line with the 'mission'. One thing they ca
90.
by two_in_one 3y ago
The main question is what to expect from OpenAI now? No changes very unlikely, that would mean it was just a power grab. So two options remain: more open, more closed. How about slow down and open up? Hope they wouldn't dumb down GPT4.

More ›