tux3

15 ms·

241.
by tux3 1y ago
The site seems overloaded at the moment, but if the URL is any indication, this seems to be the ICAR 60: https://icar-project.com/
242.
by tux3 1y ago
Yes. A valid question for a specific n would be whether you can prove the value of BB(n). If you don't care about provability, you can indeed just produce a number that happens to be the right one. So as you noticed, it only makes sens
243.
by tux3 1y ago
It does two things: Force everyone (including scrapers) to run a real JS engine, and force everyone to solve the challenge. The first effect is great, because it's a lot more annoying to bring up a full browser environment in your scra
244.
by tux3 1y ago
That might be regional, then. I wouldn't say $COUTNRY is exactly a high-trust society, but it's not quite that bad for us over here.
245.
by tux3 1y ago
They shouldn't. Just like you don't have to support when a psychotic person becomes violent. But you also can't pretend it's not part of the package. It doesn't stop being mental illness when it becomes inconvenient
246.
by tux3 1y ago
ACK
247.
by tux3 1y ago
There's usually a security person or two in the store, looking over the self checkouts. I agree that job prevents a lot of people from becoming opportunistic thiefs, but I'm making a distinction between cashiers and security. Toda
248.
by tux3 1y ago
You need the images that go with the charts. They have their own config system, which usually involves elaborate shell scripts in the images that receives parameters from the chart.
249.
by tux3 1y ago
Cashiers should not, and will not prevent theft. They're not paid nearly enough to get in danger, and it is not their job. I'm sure you can find videos of thefts in San Francisco if you need a visual demonstration. No cashier is g
250.
by tux3 1y ago
>That's not mental illness, that's behavior that we should not be welcoming in any community. No, acceptance of mental illness doesn't work if you define away anything serious as not mental illness. That's precisely t
251.
by tux3 1y ago
The post echoed some similar points from Freddie DeBoer on real mental illness not always being pretty. There's limits to inclusivity that you quickly run into with schizoaffective disorder or bipolar. Companies are proudly supportive
252.
by tux3 1y ago
Nit: You updated the wrong line in your table at the end!
253.
by tux3 1y ago
The Docker images are complex for the sake of the Helm charts, which sometimes need to pass down tons of parameters These aren't just for your laptop, they're supposed to be able to run in prod I'm still stuck with 3 bitnami
254.
by tux3 1y ago
Counterpoint: I'd rather find out in the first paragraph. If this whole article is going to be a fluffy slop-slathered delve, save me time.
255.
by tux3 1y ago
That's an interesting question, because the uop cache is filled early in the pipeline, but zero-idioms are only detected around the rename stage. They might be able to skip a plain 0x90, but something like mov rax, rax would still emit
256.
by tux3 1y ago
The room temperature or precise way the paste was applied should not matter. Modern CPUs have very advanced dynamic voltage and frequency scaling (DVFS), which accounts for several sensors, including temperature. These big x86 CPUs in stock
257.
by tux3 1y ago
It seems like the roadblock is that most cli tools don't want to think too hard about XDG in the slightest, and they delegate to standard directory libraries. Those libraries aren't normally in the business of creating symlinks,
258.
by tux3 1y ago
I thankfully found out when writing unit tests instead of in production. In Go time.Time has a much higher range than time.Duration, so it's very easy to have an overflow when you take a time difference. But there's also no error
259.
by tux3 1y ago
I believe you that you've never hit it, it's definitely not an everyday problem. But they didn't make it up, it does bite people from time to time. It's sort of a known sharp edge that people occasionally cut themselves
260.
by tux3 1y ago
The author is showing the result of s==nil and i==nil, which are checks that you would have to do almost everywhere (the so called "billion dollar mistake") It's not about Printf. It's about how these two different kind
261.
by tux3 1y ago
Unfortunately it doesn't have error handling, so when you do += 8 hours and it fails, it won't return a Go error, it won't throw a Go exception, it just silently does the wrong thing (clamp the duration) and hope you don&#x27
262.
by tux3 1y ago
IIRC people funded moving gwern to the bay not too long ago.
263.
by tux3 1y ago
Yep. I was arguing that in this case more efficiency means you can't need as many jobs as you would otherwise. That does meet my definition of efficiency gain if there are fewer employees. Whether that's a good thing and for whom
264.
by tux3 1y ago
But I think this comes back to the same question of understaffing/overwork. We have to ask what strategic thinking led to accept long response times in the past. And the answer is unequivocal. Unless we're claiming there is an int
265.
by tux3 1y ago
All else equal, the demand for support calls doesn't go up as your support becomes more efficient. I get that we're trying to look for positive happy scenarios, but only considering the best possible world instead of the most like
266.
by tux3 1y ago
Max Planck is the source of the famous quote. "A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die and a new generation grows up that is fam
267.
by tux3 1y ago
The reason that caused the team to be understaffed and overtasked has not gone away because of AI. I am expecting the team to stay understaffed and overtasked, for the same reason it was before: it's less expensive. With or without an
268.
by tux3 1y ago
> it's a huge, measurable efficiency gain. > It's not going to replace anyone's job Mechanically, more efficiency means less people required for the same output. I understand there is no evidence that any other sentence
269.
by tux3 1y ago
(The last release of which was in 2023. The Apache Open Office fiasco truly has no end.)
270.
by tux3 1y ago
That is price segmentation. People who are price insensitive will not invest the time to fix it People who are probably shouldn't be on aws - but they usually have to for unrelated reasons, and they will work to reduce their bill.

More ›