Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tux3
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
58 ms
·
871.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
It's a good way to do it! The less obvious it is that there is a remaining check hidden, the better. Some games would become impossible to win, but only halfway through or worse. Sometimes with multiple layers hidden in different place
872.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
>Those books, blogs, courses, etc are at least trying to be correct and provide you with reliable information on a topic. On topics I know really well, ChatGPT is wrong more often that courses, blogs, books, etc. However, I don't th
873.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
Yes, however if that were a problem in the scenario above, I'm pretty sure LLMs could fix that as well. They're already very good at translation today, it stands to reason that they could do the needful when it comes to turning re
874.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
dpkg-reconfigure co-workers?
875.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
If constituent parts of bound states like atoms don't really exist as separate things, how come electrons in metals can move around readily? Is it that they're not really bound, or is it just that they 'attach' and '
876.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
Of course _real programmers_ write forged microcode to define just the machine code instructions they need, and they flash the ucode update live in prod to deploy their app. But if you're weak willed and need some hand holding, the off
877.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
Assuming the post is irony, is this what you'd call a false flag? :)
878.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
Multimodal models are also a red hot area. The interesting thing might be to combine specialized instances of LLMs and other models together, where each runs a specific subtask or event processing loop. I think it'd be fun to use visio
879.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
Someone on /r/rust is currently marveling that it spit out a working bitmap allocator: https://reddit.com/r/rust/comments/zgkuq6/ ChatGPT is sensitive to how you prompt it, and it's design
880.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
So far! Prompt an LLM with agentic instructions, let it run in a loop with inputs and a command prompt. ChatGPT still might not be agentic by a skeptic's definition, even letting it run an independent loop with a data feed from its env
881.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
Those don't have agency. You can't give a voice cloner or a GAN a zsh terminal and tell it to run commands, send messages to real humans, or tell it to make money and see what ideas it comes up with. At this rate, a few days from
882.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
Let's Encrypt has had such a positive impact, I think I'll start donating to them instead of Wikipedia. They're a lot more subtle with their calls to donate, but they seem to deliver a lot of good things to a lot of users, wi
883.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
Right. If you don't have to do anything to save 2 people, no one would pull the lever. The dilemma is between being responsible for some deaths, or letting even more people die
884.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
The translation is reasonable. It loses a bit of the academic feeling ("preliminary observations suggest" replaced by a plain "it seems"), but I'm sure it could complexify it in French too if you insisted.
885.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
Jailbreaking ChatGPT will never stop being fun, I love it :)
886.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
I think showing empathy is good and important. Responding to accusations on a public forum is understandably stressful, I could understand how it's hard to stay entirely placid in that situation. And I strongly agree on inflammatory co
887.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
I believe that's the intended effect. Sheer volume of misdirection, vague answers, and thinly veiled threats leaves people tired. Anyone might reasonably not have the energy to keep picking apart the nonsense from long evasive answers.
888.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
It's possible to tell people new information with or without misjudging their capacity to follow, and with or without being boring. All those combinations happen out there. Just like a book or a movie, your audience has to be able to n
889.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
>I will be using x64 assembly with the AT&T syntax as it is objectively superior than the Intel syntax. Them's fighting words.
890.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
Moves in C++ don't make the whole object invalid, it just leaves them in a valid but unspecified state, so that at least the destructor can still run. This means calling operator bool on your unique_ptr ought to be fine, because the un
891.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
>Y'all don't get your tabs restored when you restart your browser? Ironically, the tab restore breaks when you open a new tab and it hits the "Restart required" page. On restart, the browser found a clever way to maxi
892.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
Here's a pretty good blog post that discusses how the memory models could interact: https://paulmck.livejournal.com/65341.html My understanding is that it might not be entirely settled yet, and is still being discussed
893.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
Depends on what kind of problems you you find interesting, but since it's so close to the metal, and since people want their kernel to be fast, there tends to be a lot of clever algorithms, intricate locking, architecture-specific cons
894.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
If I'm writing my own out of tree Rust module (for the sole purpose of fun), I wonder how hard it would be to bring in external no-std crates? Rust as a language feels unusually high level for something running in kernelspace, although
895.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
>As I understand it, correlation is not sufficient to prove causation. "Null hypothesis" is one statistical tool, an abstraction over our understanding of the real world. Absolutely. The only reason we use it is because most of
896.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
>"Breathing does nothing" / "Not breathing does nothing." Right, but that's because those two are actually the same! The null hypothesis in this case does not directly say whether breathing is good or bad, i
897.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
The burden of proof is generally on the person standing up and making a claim, no matter how obvious the claim is or which side they're trying to prove. But even when two people make opposite claims and there's no good consensus e
898.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
Saying we have no idea at the synapse level seems a little too strong. The abstraction level above is hard, but at the level of a synapse it goes something like this: In an upstream neuron, through some internal cell signaling that usually
899.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
Thanks for explaining, it sounds like you have a lot of big ideas and an interest in many different fields, which is cool. Something worries me though. I've seen before a pattern that happens, when people have big ideas and see a lot o
900.
▲
by
tux3
4y ago
"It's becoming harder to have a meaningful discussion on the topic of what defines art and what place AI generated images have moving forward. It feels like defending either side will cause backlash and people will implicitly incl
More ›