trilliumbaker

4 ms·

1.
by trilliumbaker 7y ago
It could be argued that AMP was that attempt, and the only reason AMP gained tractions was Google started using it in the carousel of their SERPs. While Safari, when mobile is included, has ~17% of the market, that's not enough when yo
2.
by trilliumbaker 7y ago
Google wields too much power. To an extent, they can dictate to website owners what HTML is allowed and not allowed thanks to their dominance in search. This is compounded by the fact that their browser marketshare via Chrome and now Micros
3.
by trilliumbaker 7y ago
> I think we need age limits. Ageism is not an acceptable solution. We complain about this in tech all the time. Why would we find it acceptable in politics?
4.
by trilliumbaker 7y ago
> Google's Good Intention were to support privacy I find this intent for be very difficult to believe. Chrome's privacy policy[0] already lists a ton of information that Chrome sends to Google. I am cynical and simply do not tr
5.
by trilliumbaker 7y ago
JavaScript has it covered pretty well. http://www.jsfuck.com/
6.
by trilliumbaker 7y ago
I worked as a language teacher for a while. You see products like Duolingo come along all the time. They're always accompanied by hype in how they will help you become fluent. It's simply not the case. The products are not necessa
7.
by trilliumbaker 7y ago
The cruft is getting worse as Google takes away control from managers and turns it over to AI. It's like how exact match no longer means exact match.
8.
by trilliumbaker 7y ago
I manage campaigns for a local, independent contractor. The business runs ads with a meager budget, <$500 a month. At the same time, clicks average around $5. The conversion rate hovers around 15% for those within the service area. That&