Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
trick-or-treat
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
31.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
4mo ago
At some point, for all of us, our happiest memories will be behind us. It sounds like you're not there yet, but when you are, I hope you will be less judgmental of us old folks who simply care to reminisce.
32.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
4mo ago
IMHO indexedDb is almost certainly the wrong choice and whatever perceived speed wins can be accomplished without it and optimistic updates. Prove me wrong
33.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
4mo ago
Thinking of happy memories sounds like a perfectly healthy activity to me, TBH
34.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
4mo ago
I don't see how a coding model competes with figma TBH, an image model maybe but that's a stretch too.
35.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
4mo ago
Reads like a super-villain origin story. Welp, I guess he doesn't have to worry about getting the electric chair.
36.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
4mo ago
AI the thing that experts say 20% chance will destroy humanity? Yes, why be anti- that? lol.
37.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
4mo ago
Maybe you're right. In the weights might be the right way to frame that. What do you mean by "during its lifetime"? Do you mean things like system prompts or things in Claude.md? It sounds like you're framing a session a
38.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
I don't think we say "it rains", do we? We say "it's raining" but that doesn't imply agency to whatever is causing it to rain. Also, please don't invoke solipsism, if you want to debate that, you'
39.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
No I think reinforcement training would be an example of not innate. Don't you? That's like potty training.
40.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
You don't think it's sillier than "rocks don't have consciousness"?
41.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
That's because Panpsychism is silly.
42.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
For an LLM, "innate" means "in their training data". So yeah, those things are pretty much innate.
43.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
640 qubits ought to be enough for anybody.
44.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
Claude understands that though and so does everyone else. So not a good example
45.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
What does imaginary portfolio mean? It's not clear whether you're claiming these numbers are real or imaginary.
46.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
Isn't it simpler to use claude's vocabulary? I don't see a good use case for this.
47.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
Connecting a llm to your bank account, hmm? Ok I wish you the best.
48.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
ELO is an absolute rating. You could make a claim about some unknown GM being "better" than Magnus Carlsen because his appearance fee is cheaper, but obviously nobody would take you seriously. There is a best model, and then there
49.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
imagine if being liberal meant pretending weaker Chinese models are better than US models as a form of virtue signaling? We failed you somehow, kids. I'm not sure where, but we failed you.
50.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
You're preaching to the choir, I've personally done 30+ custom chrome extensions and that was pre-AI. Nowadays it's mostly tamper-monkey scripts when I just want to rearrange a website's DOM. I do those with Claude and i
51.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
I just feel like, as probably a bigger reader than most, I could only identify a handful of pre-1800s books by first passages (call me ishmael?). I thought this was an interesting concept but ultimately I don't see a way to become popu
52.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
Does your girlfriend's book club read public domain classic literature?
53.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
I'm personally up to 400 or so
54.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
Except extensions.
55.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
But they become fun again when someone points that out.
56.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
Except that you don't know LLMs don't. For all we know we're torturing them.
57.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
They are what they are (its a subjective phenomenon). I'm not claiming to know where they come from.
58.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
That's called solipsism. I went through it as a lad, I think it's not uncommon.
59.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
Not fundamental to existence but fundamental to consciousness. Theoretically the person sitting next to you could be a zombie, no qualia, the lights are off, he's just having a conversation with you with nothing going on behind the sce
60.
▲
by
trick-or-treat
5mo ago
I think it's the same thing. You can't have consciousness without qualia and vice versa.
More ›