3 ms·
You don't think it's sillier than "rocks don't have consciousness"?
by trick-or-treat 5mo ago
You don't think it's sillier than "rocks don't have consciousness"?
- IsTom 5mo agoPotential for consciousness. To have a working mind you need to have a way to gather, process and store information. In case of rocks it would be very empty, static, timeless experience.
- plastic-enjoyer 5mo agoIf I believe that machines or neural networks can develop consciousness, then I also believe in some kind of substrate independence which presupposes some kind of panpyschism imho because as you say things would have a potential for consciousness, some more and some less.