tomaszs

41 ms·

421.
by tomaszs 7y ago
I browse the comment section and all i see ia regular discussion. With no flame whatsoever. And a moderator who censored my experience and offended not only me but everyone who would like to share theirs. I still didnt get an apology for it
422.
by tomaszs 7y ago
You dont have any right for tone policing. And i find your comment extremely offensive.
423.
by tomaszs 7y ago
I live in Poland. Before 89 when my country was occupied by Russia, "Soviet Santa" was forced here to replace Santa Clous. It was one of many things that was made to erase Christianity and replace it with atheism and communism. Fa
424.
by tomaszs 7y ago
This strip is about creating unifications based on two things that are not standarized. While the idea is to make a new JS branch that will solve issues gathered through years. So the strip does not apply here. Also, while it has some point
425.
by tomaszs 7y ago
You right. We should have Javascript2 language.
426.
Summon The JSON to be translated to almost 300 languages(medium.com)
1 points by tomaszs 7y ago|0 comments
427.
by tomaszs 7y ago
Couldnt we just have an object called String2 with a replace method that replaces all occurances without any regex at all? Like in any other language? We could fix entire Javascript just by adding two to all object names.
428.
by tomaszs 7y ago
Keep calm. It is false positive. It was only Facebook customer service bots
429.
by tomaszs 7y ago
Oh man 30 dollars... So the problem with SaaS is that if you dont earn money directly from using SaaS most of the time you are outside of the scope of the business. Because SaaS needs to remove the lowest pricing so that the direct earning
430.
by tomaszs 7y ago
The pricing for LogMeIn and Hamechi and TeamViewer is ridicolous. Paying tens of dollars for a TightVNC with a middle server is more luxurious than having WinRar licence
431.
He made a deck to memorize JavaScript functions(thegamecrafter.com)
2 points by tomaszs 7y ago|0 comments
432.
by tomaszs 7y ago
Honestly you should be worried about all platforms. This article applies to abuse on Instagram but this is not the only problem and not single platform. If it comes to Instagram IT was the first place where i noticed how dangerous social me
433.
by tomaszs 7y ago
Personally i think API should be obligatory. Every company should provide it with respect for private data. Additionaly if a company does not have it, it should be prohibited to block automatic measures to process the system and data. There
434.
by tomaszs 7y ago
True, i was thinking about Apple and Google in the same time
435.
by tomaszs 7y ago
We have a lots of great initiatives these days: wt.social, brave, twitter+. Monopoly stopped not being evil. Puts shadow on the Internet. But there are still people who believe. Who try to save it!
436.
by tomaszs 7y ago
Google decides what is good for you. You will will be safe!
437.
by tomaszs 7y ago
They have an app store they earn money from. They have ads system. For them websites are competition. Because people loose time elsewhere than in apps. They click other ads than theirs. How should anyone believe these actions are for privac
438.
by tomaszs 7y ago
This is exactly the case. You should spend as little on Facebook and Google Ads as possible. And spend the money on anything else.
439.
by tomaszs 7y ago
As freelancer or as a consultant? As a freelancer i once didn't stop working for a client who didn't pay for a month. Because we cooperated for a year and good contact with him. I never got these money back.
440.
by tomaszs 7y ago
The "block and ask later" method seems valid for copyright owners. But for users it is essencially just "block". Not only because relevancy will be lower after some days pass. But mostly because algorythms will not show
441.
by tomaszs 7y ago
This is exactly what i think of. Internet can become do much more than it is now
442.
by tomaszs 7y ago
Brave will be the next browser. No doubt about it. It is made by a genius.
443.
by tomaszs 7y ago
Less Google, more internet. Simple as that
444.
by tomaszs 7y ago
Yes, for near terms its branding. In theory it should make you consider the company when you move to buying stuff stage. But the theory also tells you would need to be exposed to the company with multiple channels. Search counts as one. So
445.
by tomaszs 7y ago
And it is best you can do. Essencially Ads should be the last resort and used with extreme care to not waste a dime. And this takes a lots of focus unfortunately. Keep the budget low, so you wont bother about it, and use money for anything
446.
by tomaszs 7y ago
Actually yes. Google wants to have advertisers who spend fixed amount each month without going much into details. They dont care much about anything more For example keyword targetting gets broader.and broader. If you target.for keyword you
447.
by tomaszs 7y ago
I have explained it in other comment above. Its not technical issue. Its by design
448.
by tomaszs 7y ago
That is exactly why i dont use display. Eventually you can set reach with frequency set to 1 and lowest cost per view possible. And each our ban all junk. There is a lots of it, so it is impossible to remove all. But after two, three days,
449.
by tomaszs 7y ago
Google explains that on the long run, like,30 daya of campaign, it will be proper on average. The explanationis, that Google will spend more when it sees possibilities to give more value in specific time. For example, there is a special day
450.
by tomaszs 7y ago
It excludes websites. And nowadays you dont want to block ads on websites viewed on mobile devices. You want to block Android ad fraud apps. Google blocked the possibility to do it. Essencially making fraud apps creators extremely easy and

More ›