throwawayfear

16 ms·

91.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
If natural immunity is acceptable, what proportion of the unvaccinated-uninfected population will just take the risk? Half? More? That's on them. It's not your job to police their choices, and especially not to impose "pape
92.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
I've provided links supporting antibodies from natural immunity multiple times. Example: https://www.science.org/content/article/having-sars-cov-2-on ... The natural immune protection that develops after a SA
93.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-27/previous-... https://www.science.org/content/article/having-sars-cov-2-on... The natural immune protection that develops after a
94.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
You keep claiming that 100M+ people in the US already have "superior" antibodies from a past infection, but you've provided no evidence of this. Yes I did, you must have missed it in the parent comments. https://
95.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
Then they should get antibody tests, and if their level of antibodies is high enough, we should let them do all the same things that vaccinated people can do. Nope. The default position is for people to all be able to do everything the sa
96.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
It's really hard to take you seriously when you are trying to equate a vaccine passport with locking everyone in monitored, isolated, government-run housing pods. The comparison is the only way to shake awake some people who are too
97.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
Natural Immunity might confer more protection to the individual against covid, but it's a terrible public health policy position if your goal is protect as many people as possible while you have perfectly good vaccines available. We
98.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
Not necessarily. Like I said in other posts, wherever vaccination requirements existed we have protocols for sharing proof of antibodies. That's all that needs to happen. If you work in a hospital or want to dorm in a college, go ahead
99.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
This is a false dilemma. It is a dishonest position to take. I can only hope you're doing it with well intentions. But the reality of the matter is that 100 million Americans had covid by now, which means they have antibodies that are
100.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
It's not an accidentally two tiered society it's an entirely conscious effort to exclude those who You're right, it's an intentional effort by Democrats in power to create divisions in the United States when the realit
101.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/10/boys-more-at-r... https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/101-child-popul... That's 25 million people in the USA alone,
102.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
You have no power over them if they choose to keep it this way forever. Especially in Australia. What are you going to do to the contrary? And how can you guarantee they won't choose to keep it this way forever? The quaranting itself i
103.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
Over 100 million Americans have superior antibodies from past covid. Why would you WILLINGLY describe those like that who refuse the vaccination as unhealthy, unclean, and even dangerous? Unless you're naive and don't know history
104.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
They would reduce transmission of the virus in the same way that locking everyone in temperature-controlled air-corrected 24/7-monitored government housing pods would reduce the transmission. Maybe those pods are better, because they c
105.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
Past covid gives antibodies that are superior to two shots of Pfizer. https://www.science.org/content/article/having-sars-cov-2-on... So yes, it IS just as good as the vaccination and should be treated as such. Va
106.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
No. Like I told someone else who asked, this is all far beyond my comfort zone. I’ve spent years mostly lurking here. I don’t like posting. I posting now because of necessity. All the alarm bells are firing. Too few are paying attention to
107.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
* If any of these COVID measures are later abused by Government then the citizenry has full rights to object in every way possible. Government has absolutely no right to take advantage of this tragic heath problem and it is incumbent on cit
108.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
It is true that evidence suggests past infection + vaccine is best. But the evidence also shows that antibodies from past infection are superior to two shots of Pfizer which the majority of people were rolling with maskless just fine. So re
109.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
Yes they can. Especially in Australia where people don’t have means to defend themselves and are falling for the “vaxed vs unvaxed” narrative. Pit sides against each other and they’ll clamor for the state to protect the peace and establish
110.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
What good is it to me or to you or to the people of Australia that the protest post arrest and the Melbourne Towers lockdown were "widely criticized?" That says nothing even if branches of government did it. That's controlled
111.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
I don't know.
112.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
We did stay in our house for two weeks. We locked down, and things were pretty locked down around where I'm at. Also, masks work and are freely given anywhere you go to shop. And vaccines are available. And natural immunity works. All
113.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
It is not a choice no matter how often the people defending it insist it's a choice. It's no more a choice than someone holding a gun to your head and asking you which poison you'd like to drink. On what planet do we live, wh
114.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
Your post could word for word be used for the opposite narrative too. Many people have lost their lives through the bloodyminded actions of those clamoring for a totalitarian regime and its systems of enslavement.
115.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
The law of gravity isn't different in Australia, and neither is 2+2. People with immunity from past covid have excellent protection, maybe even better than that from vaccination. To treat them as "antivaxers"..."in Austr
116.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
Re: your point in #1 This other source does not say that it is voluntary. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/09/pandemic-a... Returning travelers quarantining at home will be forced to downl
117.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
That is a false choice / false dilemma. "Which poison would you rather take" is not a meaningful choice. And what comfort? Facial recognition in your home? GPS tracking? RANDOM pings that send police officers to your house fo
118.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
Those systems will not go away once they are implemented. Power will consolidate. It is a system of enslavement.
119.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
So you're okay with increasingly stricter subversion of freedom, because you've consumed media fear-mongering about the pandemic. The pandemic is not deadly enough to justify building a totalitarian regime. What would have been th
120.
by throwawayfear 5y ago
Returning travelers quarantining at home will be forced to download an app that combines facial recognition and geolocation. The state will text them at random times, and thereafter they will have 15 minutes to take a picture of their face

More ›