throwaway_law

28 ms·

241.
by throwaway_law 7y ago
>She will sometimes beat them, if that's what you mean. Yes, by as much as 10 hours in the MOAB 240, she set the record in a 100K race, she won another 100 miler by 75 minutes. She set another record in a 24 hour run. >Not to me
242.
by throwaway_law 7y ago
>The theory I read says that difference between the sexes gets less as the distance increases That is my understanding also. And that's all I am saying, I'm not saying a woman is going to go out and beat Bolt in 100M sprint or
243.
by throwaway_law 7y ago
>so the male advantage is basically constant with respect to distance. No the men's speed advantage is lost over greater distances. Yes, less people run utlra's but also of those who do run them, they are higher caliber runner
244.
by throwaway_law 7y ago
Is it better to just present falsehoods as facts in a polished manner? Or downplay woman's accomplishments as niche, when its clearly the harder accomplishment? What causes one to do those things?
245.
by throwaway_law 7y ago
>There's yet to be a popular race (6 majors, olympics, world championship, even regular "city marathons" etc.) where there's an overall female winner Courtney Dauwalter dominates men in Ultra races, you can call them
246.
by throwaway_law 7y ago
>This is facile It is basic 7th grade civics, Section 4 of the Constitution: >The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government Founding Father John Adams: >"No determinations are c
247.
by throwaway_law 7y ago
>It is not a company operating in a vacuum but a public company in a democracy The US is not a democracy. It is a Constitutional Republic. The Constitution limits the Governmental Powers to make laws restricting speech, the Constitutio
248.
by throwaway_law 7y ago
(R) is only for registered marks, using it improperly can amount to Trademark Fraud. Consult a lawyer not HN. Improper use of the federal registration symbol, ®, that is deliberate and intends to deceive or mislead the public or the USPTO
249.
by throwaway_law 7y ago
>If you go to any sites that provide these sorts of things they're typically "scummy". Lots of ads, lots of Javascript, lots of dark patterns to make you load more page views Exactly why go to those sites when you can get
250.
by throwaway_law 7y ago
>People often wonder how this is fair. And that will fairly be debated until the end of time. Some jurisdictions do not have joint and several liability and so your example of liability being capped up to their % of their contributory n
251.
by throwaway_law 7y ago
The criminal is liable, but do is the bank. The US generally has a legal system that acknowledges joint and several liability, so the bank and criminal are independently 100% liable...and guess who the damaged party is more likely to get sa
252.
by throwaway_law 7y ago
>The argument seems to center around how easy/hard or expensive/cheap the process is. It is about scale of the violation of privacy rights. Take murder...its not criminal to think about murder. Its not even criminal to discuss