throwaway810

3 ms·

1.
by throwaway810 1y ago
Apparently. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/8Y3imj6bYP8
2.
by throwaway810 3y ago
GCP? Google Domains? Google Workspaces? Gmail? QUIC?
3.
by throwaway810 6y ago
You can pay all you want and still be the product.
4.
by throwaway810 6y ago
You don’t have to look too hard, though. Here’s one from 2017: https://twitter.com/SwiftOnSecurity/status/82147538290599116...
5.
by throwaway810 6y ago
Too true. Not to mention that many of the APIs Google introduce are prone to tracking and spam.
6.
by throwaway810 6y ago
I find this tweet about how Google approaches web standards illuminating. To quote: > 1. design a flawed API (it's fine! APIs are hard) > 2. ship it in the most-used browser, despite objections > 3. get cross-browser working g
7.
by throwaway810 6y ago
At least you won't get your Google account banned over bogus copyright claims.
8.
by throwaway810 7y ago
Good thing the web is still based on open standards instead of an (advertising) industry trend. We need more viable browser engines, not less.
9.
by throwaway810 7y ago
The kind of changes that Screen Time requires spans the entire platform, which means that it can only be developed incrementally. It’s inevitably going to take years before all the “obvious” loopholes are closed, but it’s not because of som
10.
by throwaway810 7y ago
> Clearly nobody at Apple or Google working on these kinds of features is a parent. That’s highly unlikely given the number of people working there. Clearly you haven’t done professional software development before. There are so many big