3 ms·

You don’t have to look too hard, though. Here’s one from 2017: https://twitter.com/SwiftOnSecurity/status/821475382905991169 https://twitter.com/SwiftOnSecurit

• AndrewBissell 6y ago
  Some in the opsec community seem to have had particularly poor takes on the question of extradition: https://twitter.com/tqbf/status/821766035401572352 https://twitter.com/tqbf/status/821766035401572352
  • slim 6y ago
    most of the well known people among those guys have security clearances to be able to work with US gov. which means they are under obligation to report on a regular basis about the people they meet. which means we can say they are part of the "intelligence community" (or if we are less charitable we can call them snitches)
    • tome 6y ago
      > they are under obligation to report on a regular basis about the people they meet Intriguing. People with a security clearance are required to give intelligence reports about people they have contact with?
      • sterlind 6y ago
        If you have contact with an agent of a foreign power, you're required to report the encounter and what you talked about. I'm not really sure how agents, or contact, are defined. I think the law is intended to keep IC people honest and forthcoming about foreign attempts to turn people. (Disclaimer: I have never held a security clearance.)