throwaway27448

5 ms·

91.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
Wouldn't this abandon the entire premise that fil-c binaries will crash rather than corrupt?
92.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
See? This comment is precisely what building a state around voters who care more about aesthetics than semantics looks like.
93.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
Americans have zero muscle to stand up for the people who actually care for this country.
94.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
There is no single or standard turing test. You could say it's been continually passing more of them over the decades. These days, I find it difficult to believe there's a human who couldn't be fooled with the right prompt.
95.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
> In other words electric power now equates to global power. In living memory, has this not been the case? Oil's use as an energy source is far more meaningful than its material use. Part of why I always questioned why calling a cou
96.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
? They make $680M a year and use it to shill for the very company responsible for destroying the open internet. Firefox hasn't been easy to recommend for over a decade now. Where on earth is that money going if not to drain money from
97.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
It sounds like you two agree.
98.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
At this point I want Mozilla to fail. They're actively draining resources from people who want to protect the open internet.
99.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
This isn't exactly new; the other model is to just hire them directly. Unfortunately this has not generally led to open source outside of the enterprise world getting similar funding, but it is what it is.
100.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
This is true of every social media that operates around engagement. Reddit, twitter, tiktok, etc. the model failed in every way except for making money. Hell, it's true of hacker news sometimes!
101.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
That still seems trivial to strip out and/or launder. Seems like theater for those who are immaterially concerned (in this case, the EU).
102.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
Agreed—electronic books should be free.
103.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
Software can be modeled as a social relation. Unless you're manufacturing your own chips from scratch, that is. Charging people for software never sat right with me.
104.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
I don't think most of the people in this thread are journalists
105.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
NBC wouldn't know how to navigate bls.gov if you put a gun to their head. And it's all downhill from there
106.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
That was the original meaning dating back at least to thomas paine (bless his heart). It is a term impossible to deploy in good faith.
107.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
You could say this about 99% of articles posted here. One might even say VCs are in the business of wasting peoples' time. But, my time is not wasted, and my cortisol managed not to spike at the presence of a tool. I suggest therapy or
108.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
Of all of ai's crimes, the greatest is bringing down the em-dash, the king of punctuation. Commas, periods, even semicolons can never hold a candle to the flexibility of the em-dash. But we must fold in the eyes of inflexible, unloving
109.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
First, all three branches are obviously quite corrupt. Second, congress can obviously still avt to speak on behalf of us and they refuse to do so.
110.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
True. It's the courts that failed humanity. Or perhaps the shits that invented copyright to start
111.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
One'll learn what is possible, how things work, etc. you sound more like a bitter veteran than a curious child and this attitude is not helpful.
112.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
At some point "slop" stopped being actually indicative of quality and I miss those days dearly
113.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
You need to find customers for several-generations-ago models before this makes any sense. AMD is a lot more incentivized to look than mr vanilla llm is
114.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
What evidence is there of Musk's competency? Actual testimony that he has provided input that has led to revenue (or some more indirect form of success)? We can all hold and spend money; I'll admit his purchase of SpaceX was intel
115.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
> Have you considered that there are reasons to do things beyond financial incentives? I'm coming around to the concept that this account might be influenced by financial incentives
116.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
> This is a mind-blowingly clueless assertion. This is not a person capable of rationally assessing facts. At best this kind of writing is interesting as an artifict of human delusion and cognitive bias. How do you figure? This descripti
117.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
Sure, but you can hardly expect to interact with the world in a rational way if you explicitly decide to ignore it
118.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
What part offended you? The statement of fact?
119.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
I don't think you can anymore , explicitly emphasizing present tense and not even a month ago, but there were many many many months where you could.
120.
by throwaway27448 2mo ago
You can't activate the hardware with a different ID regardless. It requires the owner to relinquish ownership. I'm sure this is different with different components of course depending on how granularly apple tracks their hardware—

More ›