throwaway211116

4 ms·

1.
by throwaway211116 5y ago
I do agree with 1 and I believe the influence was subtle. I also believe it might have depended on a lot of factors. Maybe some tribes were not near any animal reservoir. Maybe some diseases were transmitted due to injuries while hunting or
2.
by throwaway211116 5y ago
I'd like to hear your points. I am curious of your viewpoint.
3.
by throwaway211116 5y ago
I am not qualified to answer. I would tentatively say, decreasingly so. The issue, as I see it, is that although we have preventive measures and prophylactics and treatments (all imperfect), we do not yet have a culture of responsibility an
4.
by throwaway211116 5y ago
Non-monogamous societies have solved welfare of children in different ways. I am not able to say if any method of taking care of children is better. On the other hand, monogamy absolutely had a massive impact on STD reduction in a world wit
5.
by throwaway211116 5y ago
What is even more naive is thinking there are no other colleagues "that they haven't found a situation to screw you and the rest of the team yet, and that when such a situation happens, there's a chance they will act accordin
6.
by throwaway211116 5y ago
> That is a complete red-pillesque reductive explanation that I'd expect to hear out of a MGTOW style community Precisely, I didn't mean for that comment to sound like an endorsement. Maybe I should have used a "/s&qu
7.
by throwaway211116 5y ago
It as a "thing" for those that have an unhealthy attachment style. Those in such situations will tend to be controlling and suspicious of every minor thing in order to fend of the possibility someone else "infiltrating"
8.
by throwaway211116 5y ago
Your example showcases a relationship that is perfect in all aspects other than sexual. Many relationships are not that. In many relationships emotions may go sour, trust may fade, etc. before sex becomes dysfunctional (think about the exis