throwaway20304

4 ms·

1.
by throwaway20304 3y ago
Mercedes did something similar, though: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-63743597
2.
by throwaway20304 3y ago
Well not sure where you are, but where in EU I am, you can modify the insides of your car (people attach entire apartments to the insides of their cars...), and there's nothing wrong about stuff sticking outside - you just need to atta
3.
by throwaway20304 3y ago
I don't know anybody who implicitly assumes that the I in AI is a comparison, people around me understand it as a term for a set of traits, regardless of the level of performance. That's how the term AGI came to be, to distinguish
4.
by throwaway20304 3y ago
My point is, it's not a comparison at all. Intelligence is a trait, you either have it or not. We also use the same word for "how smart you are", but that measurement doesn't change anything about AI being intelligent or
5.
by throwaway20304 3y ago
I never thought of the I in AI as a comparison to a human of average intelligence. I always understood it means intelligence as in "capable of reasoning", regardless of whether it's "kinda dumb" or "super smart
6.
by throwaway20304 3y ago
I still don't quite understand it. Where does the battery get the energy? I understand that there's no difference in a circuit, but why is this comparison relevant? Many power sources are way less efficient that using a battery, b
7.
by throwaway20304 3y ago
How can you compare a generator to a battery? How do you charge the battery without a generator?
8.
by throwaway20304 3y ago
Kinda dumb, but still intelligent. The sibling comment explains it well.
9.
by throwaway20304 3y ago
Do you think people with IQ below 80 are not intelligent?