throwGuardian

30 ms·

241.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
None safer. Unfortunately, these are the most optimized solutions for problems with multiple parameters to tweak (safety, scalability, viability,...). If there were a better way, why wouldn't it be implemented?
242.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
> Why do you object to anyone’s but your tastes being catered to anywhere. So munch this, but for the journalists. Blog on your time, in your publication of choice, DON'T FORCE, nay bully, your employer to publish your opinions on c
243.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
Yes! We really need ESPN writers' regurgitated opinions on "Culture, Food, Politics, Whatever", though the parent company owns different publications for all that. Instead of spending that energy on writing more sports stuff
244.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
So unfair! If only a sports publication left it's writers alone to wander off onto non-sports related politics[1], ignoring the publisher's plan & repeatedly digressing from the job they were hired to do, the world would be a
245.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
You seem to believe the reverse, i.e. EU or it's member nations willing to use its economic leverage for political ends, does not happen? Isn't that rather naive?
246.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
> * separation of toddlers from their parents * horrific conditions in detention facilities * detaining immigrants for as long as they possibly can * arresting and trying to deport brown people in suspicion of being illegal immigrants Yo
247.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
> At that point the question isn't "Should we have political opinions on who we sell to," it's "Can you retain employees when your organization is so partisan." The irony in that statement! Employees are so
248.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
But Twitter and most of social media's employees are overwhelming Democrat. Google's Public fillings show 87% donated to the Democratic party, and no one in top leadership donated to the Republicans. This is such a bogus move, bec
249.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
Where do you work?
250.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
That's a rich interpretation. Tech that's at the infrastructure layer has both good and bad uses. An email can be used to deliver a greeting, or a malware payload. You've conveniently omitted your work place information, else
251.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
Is Outlook end to end encrypted? DDG has to "trust" that Microsoft won't read their strategic emails, given that Bing is much more of a direct and in-range competitor than Google is
252.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
Aren't the activists happy about JEDI? They don't want AWS to serve American defense forces, so it looks like a win-win
253.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
What does it take for CA to modernise their intake? As a customer, you should really them to change, rather than settle for a band aid around their drawbacks.
254.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
I think there's plenty needed to get to a fully funded Kickstarter too
255.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
Because their intent was to provide a secure service, as is proven by their quick turnaround time well outside work hours. Despite the lapse, they score high in authenticity, and given their small size, they deserve a second chance. Megacor
256.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
In what way is Pando remotely contrarian
257.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
It's hyperbolic to proclaim ad tech doesn't add value, given that Facebook and Google manage to serve billions of happy customers with services subsidised by ad tech. That in no way implies I approve or like what they do - I run a
258.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
IMEI is transmitted in every packet communicated with a phone, not just calls and texts.
259.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
You're free to not use the product, but to character assassinate a small, indie Dev house because you disagree with the price point, is just not OK. BTW - this rant you went on, is the quintessential indicator of you not being there
260.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
> 3 times/week is so little to be any useful. If a user is exceeding this free teir, they're likely finding it useful enough to pay, and should pay
261.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
Also, pedestrians are walking without caution (staring at their phones) at the highest rate in history. Yes, drivers should be accountable for pedestrian safety, but no law can absolve the common sense personal accountability of looking bef
262.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
The article's approach makes it impossible to draw any conclusions. 1. A statistical analysis of thousands (or more) companies, labs, universities and papers/patents needs to be performed for even a slightly meaningful scientific
263.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
Apple's P.R. is very effective at painting their totalitarian lust for control over their platform as a pro-user, pro- freedom stance, when in reality they are very much like China in their tenets. when faced with an adversary they sim
264.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
Many issues with this experiment: 1. Both VLC & Chrome are native apps. VLC defaults to SD resolution (you can check codec statistics during playback), while the YouTube web app adaptively streams the best quality your hardware and netw
265.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
You essentially got someone fired for thought crime. While in this instance, that thought crime coincidentally had a real life corroboration, it was a just a lucky happenstance. You were not in the ethical right here! It could have been th
266.
by throwGuardian 7y ago
This article is much FUD. In India, people with opposing political views routinely peacefully coexist - in fact, it is a necessity for a nation the size and diversity. Unlike what this article paints, the country is not a two party system.