Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
throwGuardian
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
If silicon/chip IP becomes free, and the only major cost to tape-out is an integration team, and Fab related stuff, China, not silicon valley, is the real winner
62.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
Top SEO strategy advice sites often carry this kind of advice: https://moz.com/blog/how-google-adwords-ppc-affects-organic-...
63.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
Start and maintain a $100/month adwords account, and magically, one's domain gets free SEO (moving up in ancillary search results) --> every S.E.O advice on the internet openly states this.
64.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
No there isn't, despite repeated high profile hacks. I've spoken to many in security, selling E2E enablement for the enterprise, and even among CIOs, there is no urgency to implement this. You can imagine the indifference among th
65.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
The FCC will likely say: "Choose between high speed internet in rural areas, and astronomer inconvenience"
66.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
Aren't these the same VCs espousing China style 9:9:6 work hours [1], promoting myths of 10x-ers who only sleep once a week, and demand from their portfolio every last breath of effort, or esle ... Please, apply some of that 9:9:6 to y
67.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
> Gitlab is still the team that ... I just don't get why the internet neither forgets nor forgives. A startup in it's early days makes mistakes, the only real mistake Gitlab made was be fully transparent about theirs. You vouch
68.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
From a purely economic viewpoint, fabs these days have such high levels of automation that locating them in Asia doesn't carry the cost benefits it used to
69.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
Isn't this still wrapped in a container. I would assume a commercial deployment would need this isolation - after all chrome allows toggling feature flags, which could bleed across instances if not containerized. The big benefit to thi
70.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
Missing in iOS Safari: 1. Binary WebRtc data channel messages 2. Browser notifications that a PWA can use 3. Web App storage beyond 50MB, and guarantee that the OS won't whimsically delete storage, despite being below 50 MB 4. You'
71.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
Is the main API chrome apps offered (that's now missing) Nacl/Pnacl?
72.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
Also, please omit webapps on iOS Safari as an alternative. Apple gives no explanations on why it cripples Safari's W3C compatibility, especially features around PWA, but everyone knows it's to drive developers, users and hence rev
73.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
The best we can do as society is to offer equal opportunity at success. Success is multifold: physical, mental and economic health jump to mind. Beyond opportunity equalized, an equitable society should bestow success proportional to the am
74.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
Apple has a track record of only punching down, never up. In China, these histrionics would be brusquely ignored with threats of a sales ban and fines, which is why Apple promptly handed over iCloud-China operations to a government owned&#x
75.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
The presence of "View Source", or extensions, or the ability to modify js is not evidence backing "All web apps need/were-meant to be open source". Just to be clear, you can pick any x86 binary and disassemble it to
76.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
> Because the code is being executed on my machine, with my data, using my online identity. You chose to execute someone else's code by visiting their website. The mere act of voluntarily executing someone else's code doesn
77.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
Why should someone be forced to make their IP "open" just because someone else on the internet feels entitled to read and potentially copy/modify/... their code?
78.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
How about illegal drugs and human trafficking, if you're going down the rabbit hole of false equivalency?
79.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
Others feel differently, as podcasting is a multi billion dollar industry
80.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
Yes indeed. And the lecturer should ask those with special pronoun preferences to address him as the Bible addresses the Lord - deferential and in plural. Because everything in language is made up
81.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
In other Amazon press releases: 1. Disabling Amazon's deep integration into Ubuntu's desktop search, is a security risk. 2. Android tablets that are not Amazon Fire are security risks 3. The reall MongoDb, if self hosted or hosted
82.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
> then tech monetized them I don't know what they intended to convey - that anyone in tech==evil. Imagine the headline that puts journalism through a similar purity test: "then the journalists monetized them". They'd
83.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
I don't know the disconnect between HN and the real world. Auth0,Okta, AWS Cognito, ... are all making good money, so clearly real costumers are paying them real money. I'd recommend using something like Fireabase as the front end
84.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
The entire premise of our Justice/legal system is not to nail someone at all costs, but to do it within the bounds of the law. More is obviously good for the state, but not the legal, ethical, moral way to go.
85.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
I have no problems with search and seizure that is backed by irrefutable "probable cause". But one year?!! Why not his entire life? The courts are stretching common sense definitions of "cause", and simply fishing for an
86.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
Because their business model relies on your personal data? The question is not why Google has your data, it's why you chose to continue using Google despite the awareness of such a scenario happening. As someone else commented, this ar
87.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
I believe Smollette staged this, but the state should not be allowed to simply get a year's worth of his personal data without cause. This tantamounts to unlawful search and seizure and a gross violation of his right to privacy, both g
88.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
Have you considered the inverse, to allow by default, and disallow flagged domains?
89.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
There's no whataboutism here - it's 3 American (foreign) companies petitioning a democratically elected local government for a free pass. Sorry, no quarter. Especially for technocratic elitist valley companies fully aware of their
90.
▲
by
throwGuardian
7y ago
Three American companies don't want to operate within the bounds of Indian law? Can you imagine 3 Russian companies not wanting to follow U.S. law, and demanding legal indemnification for their actions, in a letter to Congress. It'
More ›