4 ms·

I have no problems with search and seizure that is backed by irrefutable "probable cause". But one year?!! Why not his entire life? The courts are stretching co

I have no problems with search and seizure that is backed by irrefutable "probable cause". But one year?!! Why not his entire life? The courts are stretching common sense definitions of "cause", and simply fishing for anything to nail him As for Google, while I agree with you, the reality is that their business model relies on personal data, and we're none the wiser continuing to use them despite this knowledge. How many, even within the HN community, will bother transitioning away from Google, after reading this?

onetimemanytime 7y ago
They said one year because its better to have more than less. Court /lawyers should've or should push back.
- throwGuardian 7y ago
  The entire premise of our Justice/legal system is not to nail someone at all costs, but to do it within the bounds of the law. More is obviously good for the state, but not the legal, ethical, moral way to go.
makomk 7y ago
The supposed assault on him took place slightly more than 11 montha ago in January 2019, and there's evidence suggesting he was plotting it in advance of that date. He sued the city of Chicago claiming malicious prosecution in November. One year about covers the time period where there is definitely going to be evidence related to this.
at_a_remove 7y ago
The year is due to the possible length of planning. I have heard through some channels that they believe he has been working himself up to it for a while. In January of 2016, he performed "Strange Fruit." In 2017, he released a music video featuring a fake Trump, "alternative facts," and a noose. I haven't dug into it myself to verify, but I had heard in 2018 he and Kamala Harris were around one another on some kind of anti-hate-crime bill rally. I am less sure on that one. Now, I am not sure how much actual planning (detailed plotting) went into it, because as hoaxes go, it does not seem especially well-executed. Downtown Chicago as "MAGA Country" is especially far-fetched.

onetimemanytime 7y ago

They said one year because its better to have more than less. Court /lawyers should've or should push back.

throwGuardian 7y ago
The entire premise of our Justice/legal system is not to nail someone at all costs, but to do it within the bounds of the law. More is obviously good for the state, but not the legal, ethical, moral way to go.

makomk 7y ago

The supposed assault on him took place slightly more than 11 montha ago in January 2019, and there's evidence suggesting he was plotting it in advance of that date. He sued the city of Chicago claiming malicious prosecution in November. One year about covers the time period where there is definitely going to be evidence related to this.

at_a_remove 7y ago

The year is due to the possible length of planning. I have heard through some channels that they believe he has been working himself up to it for a while. In January of 2016, he performed "Strange Fruit." In 2017, he released a music video featuring a fake Trump, "alternative facts," and a noose. I haven't dug into it myself to verify, but I had heard in 2018 he and Kamala Harris were around one another on some kind of anti-hate-crime bill rally. I am less sure on that one. Now, I am not sure how much actual planning (detailed plotting) went into it, because as hoaxes go, it does not seem especially well-executed. Downtown Chicago as "MAGA Country" is especially far-fetched.