thewanderer1983

5 ms·

31.
by thewanderer1983 1y ago
You can actually estimate this pretty well with only your brain and basic math. Example 1 in Guesstimation by Lawrence Weinstein and John Adams, would work for this problem. The problem is about estimating the height of all lottery tickets
32.
by thewanderer1983 1y ago
Instead of an interesting discussion about the technologies used to unravel these documents, it quickly degraded into the usual politicized issues that plague the United States, and sadly it seems, now this forum. I tried emailing Dang, to
33.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
Nature is a complex system. Many are in competition, it's not just humans. Most of these systems form a balance (see biodiversity). Due to resource scarcity, power tends to form which gives these power structures and advantage. Humans
34.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
>I don't even like to see recommendations for IPA (isopropyl alcohol). Even worse, I've seen people recommend h2o. You can drown in that shit.
35.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
Sounded like Rodger was trying to make the "Chinese room argument"[0]. And here is a humorous counter point[1]. [0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_room [1] https://www.reddit.com/r&#x
36.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
> Children seem to benefit primarily from watching relationships that genuinely make both parents happy. I think you'll find the data supports chidren benefiting from a happy loving home. Not from the concern of the parents relation
37.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
> For those who want to have a substantive discussion on the federal budget and believe these cuts are justified, I have a few questions Have you seen this? https://balajis.com/p/americas-175-trillion-problem
38.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
hackernews?
39.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
combine Meta's statement with the WEF statement "You'll own nothing and you'll be happy". And you'll start to get a feel for the asymmetric "rules based order" the elites envision for the plebs.
40.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
Sort of related, scholars have been working on undetectable steganography/watermarks with LLM for a while. I would think this method be modified for steganography purposes also?
41.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
Well it depends on how you define worthless. For you as an individual to ascertain truth, it may be useless. To build up a bloated AI Enterprise stock value. For false consensus narrative scripting. Very valuable.
42.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
https://balajis.com/p/americas-175-trillion-problem Might have something to do with all this.
43.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
Not Desmos but related https://graphtoy.com/ Made by Inigo Quilez
44.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
>so there go the marketing programs that were designed for the old power structure. AKA. Cheerleading for the power structures.
45.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
Some areas you might want to consider looking into. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_privacy https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2022/06/15/using_snarks.htm... Obviously this
46.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
I agree with your conclusion. There have been similar discussions around backdoors and “lawful intercept” systems in the past. The intelligent argument didn't win there either. Then you get Salt Typhoon, and maybe people will rethink
47.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
I agree in a world of data surveillance, techniques that obfuscate, like you have mentioned are ideal. The problem with this form of obfuscation is it also impacts other industries (legitimate functions) including areas of national securit
48.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
>It looks really good for such a simple algorithm. I love this! If you like that, you should check out Inigo Quilez https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFld4EBO2RE Here is the shadertoy link with code https://www.
49.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
This is called Argument from authority and is a logical fallacy. To steal a good part from wikipedia: Scientific knowledge is best established by evidence and experiment rather than argued through authority[13][14][15] as authority has no
50.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
How do you determine what is scientific evidence and what isn't? That is done via the scientific methods.
51.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
To quote him "Whereas previously he seemed to agree with mainstream scientific opinion" Can someone please explain to me how we managed to get a whole generation of the western scientific thinkers who think the scientific method i
52.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
Thanks, found it.
53.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
As someone from Australia, which hasn't shut its self off from the China EV market. I drive a BYD Dolphin. You should be worried. They are cheaper, and more full-featured than European equivalent. They aren't junk. Also, they aren
54.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
Sorry to hijack this thread. I'm using a Dec Vt220, 420 and 510. You posted a git link back in 2020 with your improvements to making it useful. The link no longer works. Are you able to provide an updated link?
55.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
Am I missing something, or is the heading misleading. Where is the 1M gained users a day? I see statistics on likes, followers etc. Nothing here shows gain in 1M user accounts a day.
56.
The Debanking of America(thefp.com)
3 points by thewanderer1983 2y ago|0 comments
57.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
older video but doesn't require downloading and compiling https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfvo-Ujb_qk Also if you are worried, here is a good video talking about it https://www.youtube.com/shorts/
58.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
Stoicism explores these ideas. One of the basic premises is that all external events are out of our control and to focus on what is, basically what is in our mind and our actions. Then we should try to discipline our ideas around virtues wh
59.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
ahem... XII. Do not listen to others
60.
by thewanderer1983 2y ago
And can your finger AI? Doubt it.

More ›