Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
themusicgod1
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
themusicgod1
6mo ago
astronaut #2 "do what scares you...that's why I'm [on artemis]" clearly very risk-aware.
2.
▲
by
themusicgod1
6mo ago
from one of the artemis astronauts on livestream: "It is very risky, and we are intimately [aware] of that risk" ie It's not perfectly safe, and the astronauts are well aware of this fact.
3.
▲
by
themusicgod1
6mo ago
> aims to be perfectly safe obviously that isn't true -- it aims to be relatively safe ...but in any case - it aims to bring humanity to the moon . That's the aim. Keep your eye on the prize.
4.
▲
by
themusicgod1
6mo ago
>It doesn’t make any sense to spend that much money on something that’s still Russian roulette for the astronauts. Sure it does. We've got billions of humans to spend on getting humanity out of its gravity well. We can and will spar
5.
▲
by
themusicgod1
10mo ago
> this will hurt artists a lot as they need the fees paid by Spotify to make ends meet. Anyone using DRM/paracopyright to "make their ends meet" deserves what they get. This is de facto theft from the public domain.
6.
▲
by
themusicgod1
10mo ago
> Spotify is $12/month at most to get unlimited ad-free access to virtually all music. Until they decide to silence the artist you want to listen to because emperor god trump decides to unperson them. Putting what music you listen t
7.
▲
by
themusicgod1
10mo ago
I am. Copyright is fucking cancer and is one of the worst things if not the worst things that exists to make creating new things harder. Making bits available isn't "taking artists ability to live in a financially viable way&qu
8.
▲
by
themusicgod1
1y ago
"very easy" if you have access to the correct dependencies which outside of microsoft's walled garden, and access to a free LLM ( https://elevenfreedoms.org/ ) which is not guaranteed at all all of this looks
9.
▲
by
themusicgod1
1y ago
Copyright has always been based on moral principles. 'Moral rights' have been part of copyright longer than "encourage innovation and hustle" has been something the government has considered worth promoting. The orig
10.
▲
by
themusicgod1
2y ago
yet another github project. STOP USING GITHUB
11.
▲
by
themusicgod1
2y ago
seems like shortwave can come back if 2 things come back * access to electronic components [ie something like radioshack used to be being accessible] * local governments stepping back of regulation of airwaves a hint unless you have one or
12.
▲
by
themusicgod1
2y ago
Publishing to Github should be considered a crime.
13.
▲
by
themusicgod1
2y ago
> With those modifications, it then builds Python from source across a wide matrix of Python versions, platforms, and build variants (e.g., optimized vs. debug builds), and publishes the built distributions to GitHub Releases. This shoul
14.
▲
by
themusicgod1
2y ago
> But even that open source model needs to have basic ethical protections, or else I'll have nothing to do with it. If you don't understand that the eleven freedoms are "basic ethical protections" you have already fai
15.
▲
by
themusicgod1
3y ago
Github does not count as open source: this is not actually open source.
16.
▲
by
themusicgod1
3y ago
github only = this is not open source unlike, say, wormhole
17.
▲
by
themusicgod1
3y ago
damn you're not joking
18.
▲
by
themusicgod1
3y ago
codeberg are censors. People should be migrating elsewhere. https://codeberg.org/themusicgod1/codeberg-is-corrupted-dont...
19.
▲
by
themusicgod1
3y ago
[work in progress, if you see any others let me know] @zei_squirrel@mastodon.social
20.
▲
by
themusicgod1
3y ago
anyone got a list of recent-purged-from-X left-leaning journalists fedi accounts?
21.
▲
by
themusicgod1
3y ago
They should have left for the fediverse long ago. http://b4hntuy3fimfh2227vf4f74emnya7p35i5brtqujs6leqvtclfwvj...
22.
▲
by
themusicgod1
3y ago
> a bazillion authors was this necessary?
23.
▲
by
themusicgod1
3y ago
ugh STOP USING GITHUB
24.
▲
by
themusicgod1
3y ago
it's retracted / BS
25.
▲
by
themusicgod1
3y ago
a fair summary would be to say it's retracted because it's BS
26.
▲
by
themusicgod1
3y ago
It shouldn't matter. Nobody should be using github post-2018.
27.
▲
by
themusicgod1
3y ago
> It's a low tech solution but if everyone did it, everyone would have content to read. Except the people Microsoft unpersons.
28.
▲
by
themusicgod1
3y ago
Stop using github!
29.
▲
by
themusicgod1
3y ago
> Assuming moderation can be automated using the recent advancements in AI You're joking right?
30.
▲
by
themusicgod1
3y ago
those who do not learn from the past are doomed to repeat it
More ›