tetrometal

6 ms·

1.
by tetrometal 6y ago
I owe you an apology. I was sure I had posted the article referencing his conclusions video, but I did not, and I ended up wasting your time and compounding my error with an unfounded accusation. That was pretty egregious and rude, and I&#x
2.
by tetrometal 6y ago
Kamala Harris literally paid for their defense. Entire books were written in their defense, one infamous title being "In defense of looting". MSM talking heads were besides themselves defending the rioters. For months! > 100% o
3.
by tetrometal 6y ago
True. It's also true that he told them to protest peacefully BEFORE the riot as well. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." Fran
4.
by tetrometal 6y ago
It's crazy to me that you think the media should make that decision for us instead of just presenting the facts.
5.
by tetrometal 6y ago
You believe Trump was making some kind of insurrection suggestion with his invitation to a rally in the capital. I don't. You think there's something between the lines of his words, but that's just speculation. If you're
6.
by tetrometal 6y ago
Matt Braynard's evidence was not seen in court.
7.
by tetrometal 6y ago
It's attitudes represented by this blithe dismissal of a compelling argument that will continue to divide the nation. I guess you think you're going to get something out of it, but this is a scenario that nobody wins. ¯\_(ツ)_&#x2F
8.
by tetrometal 6y ago
You're comparing apples and oranges. You're comparing the results of the former (which you have painted in an incredibly rosy light) to the potential outcomes of the latter. If we look at the potential outcomes of the BLM/Ant
9.
by tetrometal 6y ago
I don't understand why you think I'm standing up for any of them.
10.
by tetrometal 6y ago
I thought the savior figure was the guy with horns and a fur cape prancing about on the dais? Glad they got him. We were THIS close to the end of the US, I tell ya'.
11.
by tetrometal 6y ago
Not really. The vast majority were thrown out on procedural grounds. The left completely controls the MSM at this point. It's unsurprising that large swathes of officials, including judges, are unwilling to investigate their narrative
12.
by tetrometal 6y ago
You sure about that? How many cases were thrown out on their merits vs. procedural grounds?
13.
by tetrometal 6y ago
> Another side told people that their country was being stolen from them and only they could stop it before telling them to go to the capital. Was it or wasn't it being stolen? Do you have a debunking of Matt Braynard's argumen
14.
by tetrometal 6y ago
> Show the receipts that the election was stolen before you decide to broadcast that claim to millions. Again, look at Matt Braynard's work. It's compelling, and has been completely ignored. [1] The right isn't pissed beca
15.
by tetrometal 6y ago
I see it's graduated from "mostly peaceful" to "overwhelmingly peaceful". The craziest part of your spin is that by applying it, you're greatly increasing the odds of actually getting it.
16.
by tetrometal 6y ago
You're narrowing the criteria to match this specific event and asking for an exact replica the left, of which there are none. We see through your rhetoric. Last summer was replete with examples of violence from the left. Far more deadl
17.
by tetrometal 6y ago
You're just making assertions and hoping that the zeitgeist continues to agree with you. It's easy for the winning side to trot out a bunch of people that support their position (and if you try suggesting R's are on the same
18.
by tetrometal 6y ago
They did reach the floor. Some topless dude with horns and a fur cape pranced about the dais. And guess what? We're fine. You're pulling together a handful of facts from a massive event composed of trillions of facts and weaving t
19.
by tetrometal 6y ago
They are obviously pointing out the hypocrisy and bias with which the left spins narratives. Here's a pointed question for you: Which was worse and by what measure, the BLM/Antifa riots of last year or the capitol building riot?
20.
by tetrometal 6y ago
You literally responded to zero words in the parent's comment.
21.
by tetrometal 6y ago
This is precisely the expertly spun narrative I can watch on CNN or MSNBC. It's wonderfully constructed, people get paid a lot to do it. It's also just a lie. To fully half of the American population, and a rapidly growing proport
22.
by tetrometal 6y ago
> The fact remains that the President gathered tens of thousands of people and, with a torrent of lies, weaponized them into an attack on the United States. Just because it failed doesn't make it any less grave of a crime. I cannot
23.
by tetrometal 6y ago
If he's discussing Matt Braynard's data, that data doesn't have strong indications of dead people voting being an issue. It does present a compelling argument that really needs to be addressed sooner than later, however. The
24.
by tetrometal 6y ago
I think the truth will eventually come out. I HOPE that those claiming sufficient fraud to effect the election are dead wrong. The alternative would be a nightmare. That's why the media and big tech shouldn't have buried their hea
25.
by tetrometal 6y ago
"This company cannot be brought to heel quickly enough." That you can say that and not think of yourself as authoritarian is the reason the US is so divided right now.
26.
by tetrometal 6y ago
Quote the wording you think Trump used to organize an insurrection. Juxtapose that with the wording you would be okay with him using to organize a protest. Then try to tell me that the difference between them is "insurrection".
27.
by tetrometal 6y ago
This spin leaves me incredulous. How does Trump inviting a protest equate to "inciting treason and sedition"? Y'all are bonkers.
28.
by tetrometal 6y ago
No, your argument requires that we ignore the fact that good cases may take time to develop. Consider the Voter Integrity Fund by Matt Braynard. It's one of the more convincing arguments I've heard to date, and involved making man
29.
by tetrometal 6y ago
There are many cases being presented in the courts, by many plaintiffs. I'd be surprised if there weren't some frivolous ones in there. That doesn't mean they all are, and we can't know until they are presented. If your
30.
by tetrometal 6y ago
I think the angst in the public sphere is much, much deeper than some politician "rallying their base". My take is that the federal government has accrued far, far more power than was ever intended. The entire population of the US

More ›