Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
temp8964
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
94 ms
·
961.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
I am asking about practice, not theory.
962.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
So what happens to people refuse to work for the cops in other countries? "Sorry for bothering you, bye-bye"?
963.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
A. GitHub / GitLab + local clones B. self-hosted server + self-maintained offsite backup A is obviously easier than B. And also A has tons of other benefits.
964.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
It's not just the scripts. There is an offsite server need to be setup, and maybe paid to keep it reliably running for the long term. Sounds too much ado for nothing compared to use free private repos on GitHub / GitLab.
965.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
How does any of those similar solutions solve the data backup problem? I always think GitHub / GitLab also serves as an off-site backup.
966.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
So maybe send them to prison for a few months / years or fine them a few thousand dollars is even better than destroy their career? Also, how about climate deniers, people say anti-union things? They will be handled in the next round.
967.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
But the root of the problem is not the technology, it is the people and the culture. I have no doubt, using tweets to cancel people is a deliberate tactic of the far left activists to win the culture war. And they are winning, a lot. After
968.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
The tweet didn't do any of those.
969.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
It is not retaliation at all. Unionization changes how the company works, payment can be changed accordingly.
970.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
He didn't make threats. He is simply stating the fact that unionization will cause the company to change payment schedule, because circumstance changed, which is not a retaliation.
971.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
No. The second is legal.
972.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
What? He is not talking about targeting anybody.
973.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
If the practice of changing payment schedule legal?
974.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
Not at all. It is clearly not targeting one person. It simply means we will change how we pay if unionized. Is it allowed?
975.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
Where is the retaliation? He is stating the change of payment schedule after the unionization. This is not allowed?
976.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
How did he invade employees' rights?
977.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
Is quid pro quo for sexual favors from students legal? Is change payment schedule after unionization legal?
978.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
Also first amendment. Why can't CEO say anti-union things? Are they allowed to say pro-union things?
979.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
To make a fair presentation, it also need to list truthful reports. By the end of the day, the simple logic is that the false reports do not hurt truthful reports. If the truthful reports prove their point, no matter how many false reports
980.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
You didn't. I proved your RU-US example did not fit in the context of UK-EU.
981.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
Shouldn't the website also list factual reports proving their point that EU is over-regulated? No matter how many reports got wrong, they don't hurt the reports are factual and correct.
982.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
So the Brexit to EU is like KGB to US? Why do you want to keep UK inside EU then?
983.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
The difference is whether the government gets involved.
984.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
Of course. I assume there are concerned citizens in the EU can do this. Why does the government need to get involved in this?
985.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
Lol. EU doesn't have NGO can do this? The government has to be the one to run the Truth department?
986.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
I can't believe official government resources are designated to this kind of stuff. It sounds authoritarian to me. No matter how you disprove the selected "euromyths". This action itself just directly prove the broader point:
987.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
What? Don't some computer hackers also make business harder for regular users? Maybe you have a very different definition of hacker.
988.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
In a broader sense, they can be considered as hackers.
989.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
I want to check the validity of your story, but unfortunately I can't find a CD, or a floppy drive.
990.
▲
by
temp8964
6y ago
But Georgia officials are claiming the opposite. Remember, the sectary of state is the same person stand against Trump. For the "narrow time window" claim, Biden got "Four Pinocchios" assessment from WashingtonPost. htt
More ›