4 ms·

Not at all. It is clearly not targeting one person. It simply means we will change how we pay if unionized. Is it allowed?

• detaro 6y ago
  "you" is clearly "you workers" and not a single person in this context, and no, threatening more people doesn't make it more legal.
  • temp8964 6y ago
    If the practice of changing payment schedule legal?
    • TheDong 6y ago
      In this case, I don't think it would be legal even if it normally is. Doing it in this case would be retaliation for a protected action. The National Labor Relations Act ensures the right to organize unions, and changing pay as a result of union-related activity would be illegal retaliation. This is similar to how an at-will employee can be fired for any reason _except_ for a protected class, like their race / gender / religion, etc.
      • temp8964 6y ago
        What? He is not talking about targeting anybody.
  • natch 6y ago
    “Threaten” is a highly charged word here, and it reveals the bias of those who use it. I’ll take my downvotes, but think about it. It’s a startup, they didn’t have huge profits at that time. People should be allowed to state facts, or opinions for that matter.