teekert

4 ms·

31.
by teekert 11d ago
Yes it changed, first it reduced the transparency in many places, most notably in notifications, and made the glass dark. Now it makes the glass just a black plastic, but also in the launcher, where dark icons don't pop out anymore. Th
32.
by teekert 11d ago
“Hurd Linux”? Maybe leave that judgement to Torvalds. Canonical is a company they do what the CEO wants. And you are free to do what you want. Quick question: are the fruits of your labor mostly given away for free?
33.
by teekert 12d ago
What happened is that the accessibility setting “reduce transparency” which indeed used to reduce transparency and made glass backgrounds darker, now makes them fully black. So dark icons don’t come out of the background anymore. What we go
34.
by teekert 12d ago
In my head the RV was parked and the VR provides a virtual office in the small space :)
35.
by teekert 12d ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45662685
36.
by teekert 12d ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45662685
37.
by teekert 12d ago
Jeez, it's an accessibility feature and they just turned it off! I don't mind liquid glass and can handle the transparency mostly, but the notifications are just god-awful and difficult to read (white on light glass, using dark mo
38.
by teekert 12d ago
Hmm, got the liquid glass slider, put it all the way to the right, but still lost a lot of contrast in my notifications...
39.
by teekert 12d ago
Not cinema size, and not with your poor eyes focused on "infinite". And not any of this on a plane, or a train, or a self driving car, or an RV.
40.
by teekert 12d ago
I have in claude.md and it has in it's memory that it is my thinking partner. I don't want any action until I explicitly tell it to do so. And I don't want fancy dialogs because the options disappear when you dismiss them...
41.
by teekert 12d ago
Great "elaboration" (actually it's an "example"), indeed pulling everything into the political dimension is one of the concerning things regarding anything Linux nowadays, imho. Next up: DHH!
42.
by teekert 12d ago
ok, that's concerning, if you post it here I'll vote for it (after confirming).
43.
by teekert 12d ago
Yeah, shouldn't have called it legacy, perhaps OG would have been more appropriate.
44.
by teekert 12d ago
Yes, sorry and thanx, I played a bit with the sentence, not happy with the first thing I submitted -> Corrected now.
45.
by teekert 12d ago
Rush? This is an interim release (95% or so only tracks LTS's) that is not even out yet... Go file a bug reports if you have some time.
46.
by teekert 12d ago
Right?! There is so much of this! In my country, for financial products, there needs to be a very clear label with some obligatory fields (we don't allow pharma commercials, but I think Americans know this as the details rattled off af
47.
by teekert 12d ago
It's a complete shadow economy, users don't want it and mostly don't know it. But sometimes it surfaces, ie we had a public gathering in my village about the plans to restructure one of our main streets, since people don&#x27
48.
by teekert 13d ago
So you’re saying the people should be aligned with the government?
49.
by teekert 14d ago
When I slowly shake my shoulders I feel and hear air going from one lung into the other. But not 100% sure if that is what it is.
50.
by teekert 15d ago
I am inclusive in that sense and enjoy both AI and non-AI content, and will post both.
51.
by teekert 15d ago
Fun reference I tested on 32 GB ram laptop with no extra GPU: llama.cpp: “what is ls”, almost immediate starts answering at one ~word/sec. Ask opencode with same model (some gwen e4b or something) to check what’s in its working directo
52.
by teekert 16d ago
On some more testing, I don't seem to alter direction, just suddenly start to accelerate again. Ah well, it worked mostly.
53.
by teekert 16d ago
Hmm, by some bug my back arrow first slows me down from approaching c, but then will sudddenly spead me back up (while going backwards), so I get stuck in a dark world. (Firefox on Linux). Edit, maybe it's because the speed shift is so
54.
by teekert 17d ago
Looking forward to the first broken screens, and Apple's official reply: "You're folding it wrong."
55.
Le Creuset x Star Trek: limited-edition pieces bring Star Trek into the kitchen(lecreuset.co.uk)
2 points by teekert 18d ago|1 comments
56.
by teekert 18d ago
Hey that’s a Fermi Paradox solution.
57.
by teekert 19d ago
I’ve had that as well haha. I have read many books for about 50%. I try not to feel guilty about it. Glass half full, right?
58.
by teekert 19d ago
They are really creating a lot of buzz recently. I love it, I hope they succeed beyond just us geeks here. It is imho imperative for a fair and balanced technological society that it retains the means for truly private and secure communicat
59.
by teekert 19d ago
For me there are novels with such big pay-offs that they are worth 100s of pages of setup to me. I usually only start them when I read online that they are worth it. I had this with Atlas Shrugged (500-600 pages of setup?). Some are simply
60.
by teekert 19d ago
Yeah same. I recently read the whole series to my son after he had begged me to stop after a couple of pages about 2 years ago. I told him: just keep your mind open for 100 pages. The start is so cold, and weird. You can only feel the warmt

More ›