tedivm

29 ms·

451.
by tedivm 3y ago
Not in the bay area.
452.
by tedivm 3y ago
It may have been great for you, but I regularly had drivers refuse to take me or abandon the ride once they saw the destination. The worst part is that they report you as not showing up, and then uber/lyft both will add no show fees fo
453.
by tedivm 3y ago
I've also got an open source terraform module for this- https://github.com/tedivm/terraform-aws-nat
454.
by tedivm 3y ago
Firefox mobile sync has gotten really, really good. If that's what's holding you back you should check it out again.
455.
by tedivm 3y ago
I don't understand how the "head of open source" software can claim that a license which literally begins by saying it is not open source, is in fact open source. You're right gaslighting the community or you're eng
456.
by tedivm 3y ago
Sentry is one of the rent extracting companies. They want to extract value from the open source community, including marketing value, without actually being open source.
457.
by tedivm 3y ago
If you look at it from a high level, Sentry wants to have their cake and eat it too. They don't want to promote GPL/AGPL open source development because it's harder for them to profit off of it, but they don't want other
458.
by tedivm 3y ago
Open Source has always meant without limitations on use. You want to extend the standard to add a limitation on use, which would in turn radically change the definition of open source (to the point where you'd extinguish the current de
459.
by tedivm 3y ago
Read the first line of the BSL license- > The Business Source License (this document, or the "License") is not an Open Source license. However, the Licensed Work will eventually be made available under an Open Source License, a
460.
by tedivm 3y ago
At this point it's hard not to think that they're purposefully ignoring this. It doesn't matter how many times I say that I don't care about their license, just their messaging, and yet we've got at least three empl
461.
by tedivm 3y ago
It's kind of crappy for you and others at Sentry to attempt to unilaterally change the definition of open source, despite the fact that there clearly is opposition to it.
462.
by tedivm 3y ago
There are a lot of companies that support open source (Github has given away far more than you have, other companies sponsor employees to work on software directly, etc etc), you aren't special just because you claim that you're a
463.
by tedivm 3y ago
Oh please. I am not saying they're required to be open source. I'm not saying they shouldn't be shared source. I'm simply saying they shouldn't lie about being open source. If CodeCov had the exact same license with
464.
by tedivm 3y ago
You should really disclose that you work for Sentry/CodeCov in your comments about this. Being "scheduled for open source in three years" is not the same as being open source today. Keep in mind there is a third option- CodeC
465.
by tedivm 3y ago
You can argue all you want, but it's not Open Source and even you agree about that. Whether "source available" is better or not is an argument I don't really care about- it's just a red herring. The issue I have is
466.
by tedivm 3y ago
The abusive part is the lie, especially the lie that is literally trying to change the definition of open source. There are sentry employees in this very thread trying to argue that "BSL is open source". If CodeCov said "We a
467.
by tedivm 3y ago
>BSL is rolling Open Source with delay. .... which means it's not open source. The "irregular interval" companies general release the source at the same time they deliver a new software version. It's not a fair compar
468.
by tedivm 3y ago
Open source has meaning, and you're polluting that meaning. It would be one thing if you were honest about it, but by continuing to call closed source software open you're proving that this isn't just a mistake but is actuall
469.
by tedivm 3y ago
I completely disagree with this- they aren't making an effort at all here, they're actively damaging a movement. They could have just said they were going shared source or one of the other "closed for use, but open for audit&
470.
by tedivm 3y ago
I am so freaking sick of companies lying and exploiting open source. This is Embrace, Extend, Extinguish at it's finest. By calling closed source software open source they're moving the window and confusing the entire concept of o
471.
by tedivm 3y ago
For the first example, I think that was just due to the specific problem being solved. I can tell you there are a ton of places that aren't yet "solved" yet, and that aren't trivial to solve either. One thing we haven&#x
472.
by tedivm 3y ago
Everyone I've met with these skills has either a masters degree or a PhD. I do know several people who got their PhD earlier in their careers who are really into AI now, but they had the foundational math skills to keep current as new
473.
by tedivm 3y ago
Not every company is OpenAI. What OpenAI is trying to do is solve a generic problem, and that requires their models to be huge. There's a ton of space for specialized models though, and those specialized ones still outperform the more
474.
by tedivm 3y ago
AWS does not offer great discounts on the GPUs at this point, as they don't have nearly enough of them to meet demand. I'm no longer at a startup, and have worked at a couple of larger companies. That said I'm mostly respondi
475.
by tedivm 3y ago
I've found most larger companies are more concerned about opex than capex. Large companies aren't going to have much of an issue there. My response was more for these folks the OP mentioned- > There is almost no universe where
476.
by tedivm 3y ago
There are datacenters that are specializing in this, and they exist today. I highly recommend Colovore in Santa Clara. They got purchased by DR not too long ago, but are run independently as far as I can tell. Their team is great, and they
477.
by tedivm 3y ago
I'd argue that you really don't need 1000+ H100s to test things out and make a viable product. When I was at Rad AI we managed just fine. We took a big chunk of our seed round and used it to purchase our own cluster, which we setu
478.
by tedivm 3y ago
>Often, if you try to ask a question on Stack Overflow, it’ll get marked as a duplicate with a link to a question that is absolutely not a duplicate. Or the duplicate will be to a question that was never answered. I experienced this just
479.
by tedivm 3y ago
That article makes it clear that the NAT Gateway needs IPv4 > The NAT gateway recognizes the IPv6 address prefix, extracts the IPv4 address from it, and initiates an IPv4 connection to the destination. As usual, the source IPv4 address i
480.
by tedivm 3y ago
Yeah, this is my only real complaint with this. Internally their IPv6 support is pretty garbage, which is kind of fine since your internals shouldn't be exposed externally anyways, so it's in theory possible to have an internal IP

More ›