4 ms·
At this point it's hard not to think that they're purposefully ignoring this. It doesn't matter how many times I say that I don't care about their license, just
by tedivm 3y ago
At this point it's hard not to think that they're purposefully ignoring this. It doesn't matter how many times I say that I don't care about their license, just their messaging, and yet we've got at least three employees from Sentry completely ignoring that and acting as if we don't think they have a right to license their own software.
It's a straw man that lets them ignore the actual issue people have.
- ssddanbrown 3y agoThey've been like this before with Sentry, when I've raised their sketchy use of open source. I have some example queries/responses in this issue: https://github.com/ssddanbrown/Open-Source-Confusion-Cases/issues/7 https://github.com/ssddanbrown/Open-Source-Confusion-Cases/i... The repo readme has other examples of sketchy cases of open source and licensing usage. This aspect (of why not just use a different term) often gets ignored. Sometimes folks say they're using it "to prevent confusion to users since they would have heard about open source" which is always an ironic self-involved viewpoint to see.