I completely disagree with this- they aren't making an effort at all here, they're actively damaging a movement. They could have just said they were going share

I completely disagree with this- they aren't making an effort at all here, they're actively damaging a movement. They could have just said they were going shared source or one of the other "closed for use, but open for audit" licenses that exist. Instead they lied about what they're doing, and did so in a way that damages open source development. Making an effort only counts as a good thing if they're making an effort to do good things. This isn't that though.