tasuki

11 ms·

241.
by tasuki 6mo ago
Why's there all them chilled bottles in the photo?
242.
by tasuki 6mo ago
Making Money, the ultimate "legitimate use case".
243.
by tasuki 6mo ago
> In a recent analysis, Adam Harvey found that among the 999 most popular crates on crates.io, around 17% contained code that do not match their code repository. Huh, how is this possible? Is the code not pulled from the repository? Why
244.
by tasuki 6mo ago
Hah, late but a solid reply - thanks! I'm a lot more agnostic than you are: I don't know whether LLMs are conscious. I like the ideas of panpsychism, and sometimes I think a for loop might be a little conscious, so I was surprised
245.
by tasuki 6mo ago
> These new Prediction Markets are nothing but a new way of gambling. There are two kinds of participants, those with inside information and liquidity providers. The liquidity providers incentivize the insiders to share the information.
246.
by tasuki 6mo ago
> I don't see why foreign adversaries can't monitor Polymarket to get advanced warning of military actions. They can and I'm sure they do. If you were about to be hit by the most powerful army in the world, wouldn't y
247.
by tasuki 6mo ago
Yes, I suppose. Remember people are parts of various nations. Your "national security threat" might be a "national security opportunity" for someone else ;)
248.
by tasuki 6mo ago
Do you propose to make all addictive endeavours illegal? Ban porn? It might actually be a good idea in theory, but I doubt it'd work in practice, who knows.
249.
by tasuki 6mo ago
> I want a maximalist setup. > Is there any point in me even trying Pi, or should I just stick with Claude Code? I'd say stick with Claude Code. I'm a minimalist and hate everything about Claude Code!
250.
by tasuki 6mo ago
I wanted to reply, but I think I just don't understand your comment at all. Are you saying the "sector of betting on shit that can clearly be insider-traded" is illegal? Does that include like gold and S&P500? The way I s
251.
by tasuki 6mo ago
Yes, and let me add that that's by design. Prediction markets' main function is to incentivize people with private information to make it public.
252.
by tasuki 6mo ago
> I keep explaining to my peers, friends and family that what actually is happening inside an LLM has nothing to do with conscience or agency What would the insides have to look like to have anything to do with conscience or agency?
253.
by tasuki 6mo ago
> One of the ideas I like about opencode is the ability to prompt and such from a web browser. So I'm curious if that is the client-server architecture you are talking about, or if it's something else. Yes, this is what I meant
254.
by tasuki 6mo ago
> Can you please give us concrete reasons that make Pi better than Claude Code for you? I'm not the person you're replying to, but I value good architecture and elegance for aesthetic and maintainability reasons, the MIT licens
255.
by tasuki 6mo ago
One of the selling points of Pi is that it doesn't "smother the model with ingenuity": it's a minimal harness with a focus on transparency, includes a minimal system prompt, and does not add needless tokens to what you
256.
by tasuki 6mo ago
Yes, but iirc Mario Zechner is – in his own words – post economical.
257.
by tasuki 6mo ago
CC is a steaming pile of vibe-coded bloat. If that rocks your boat, go knock yourself out. Is it better than OpenCode? It's certainly much smaller and doesn't have a client-server architecture - already that is a big win.
258.
by tasuki 6mo ago
Pi doesn't claim to get better results. It is conceptually simpler, smaller, and more transparent to the end user than most harnesses. It's as much about the things it doesn't do as about what it can do.
259.
by tasuki 6mo ago
Wow, I couldn't disagree more! Claude Code is a steaming pile of vibe-coded bloat. Pi has been elegantly designed with a minimalist mindset. > It has about half the relevancy of "MCP", which is such a similar concept where
260.
by tasuki 6mo ago
> The fact I can't understand what Earendil is after reading this many words is an even bigger red flag. Same, but I heard about Armin Ronacher, and the things I heard were not exactly terrible. He's the creator of the Flask mi
261.
by tasuki 6mo ago
You gain the extra information by having reasonable commit messages rather than the ones you mentioned. To fix CI you force push. Can you explain to me what an avid squash-merger puts into the commit message of the squashed commit composed
262.
by tasuki 6mo ago
> A good reviewer looks at the end-state and does not care about individual commits. Then I must be a bad reviewer. In a past job, I had a colleague who meticulously crafted his commits - his PRs were a joy to review because I could go c
263.
by tasuki 6mo ago
So what? Detecting whether content was produced by AI is impossible. Please stop shilling tools promising the impossible. The mentioned 99.98% accuracy is complete bullshit.
264.
by tasuki 7mo ago
> Speed Dreams I wonder why that isn't in the Debian repos?
265.
by tasuki 7mo ago
> built-in predictable RNG What's that?
266.
by tasuki 7mo ago
A bit too bleeding edge for me, but it does look super nice (ie exactly like Elm).
267.
by tasuki 7mo ago
Solid analysis by Claude!
268.
by tasuki 7mo ago
What is your definition of welfare? Generally caring how the citizens are doing? I believe governments usually don't. There's too much politics for that.
269.
by tasuki 7mo ago
Thanks! I keep creating new mazes by hand, right now I'm at 45 and the goal is 60, plan is that then the game is finished :) Initially, I wanted to create a maze generator. But I had no idea how to write it. Creating mazes by hand, I&#
270.
by tasuki 7mo ago
> Why do laborers have to work for the right to live I don't know why, but this is sort of the definition of a laborer, no? Someone who labors. People who live on welfare are – by definition – not laborers. That was my whole point:

More ›