Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tasuki
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
271.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
> doesn't look like he started this project, so I'm not sure it's his place to archive it. This is a very valid point. It indeed looks like it was done in affect rather than after careful discussion with the (at least) ten
272.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
I came to the comments section to shoot down the article, and I see you fine people have already done an excellent job. I just upvoted y'all.
273.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
It's either generousness or incompetence.
274.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
> ending welfare as we know it > That attack on labor How is ending welfare an "attack on labor"? (I live in a welfare state and am quite happy about it, despite it having very real financial consequences for me. Welfare sta
275.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
> You do have walls, they're just implicit. Yes but not each constellation of walls can be lifted into the 2.5 dimensions: it's important that two neighboring flat cells which are separated be at different heights. Also I do no
276.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
> being connected and being non-cyclic (properties you want for a perfect maze where you can reach every location and where there is exactly one route between every two locations) Connected, sure, that's table stakes. But why is bei
277.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
Thanks. Believable - when my kid is glued to a tablet with another kid and they're talking about what they're seeing or doing, it makes me feel much better than when she's doind the same by herself...
278.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
Is... that a bad thing or a good thing? Are you saying the snowman should move slower? Are you using small or large screen, touch or keyboard?
279.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
Well, I don't have "walls" - my maze is sort of 2.5 dimensions - so that complicates things somewhat. I wonder whether there's an algorithm to "lift" a 2d maze with walls into my 2.5d maze, and I think if it&#
280.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
> It really depends on what you mean by "interesting". Yes. I haven't gotten far enough in my journey to be able to formulate that. The first insight is that the details of branching make a difference: humans don't pi
281.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
The WFC/model synthesis article is very interesting, thanks. Yes the color floods are stunning, but these are exactly the algorithms which do not produce very interesting mazes. In particular, I don't think the "no loops"
282.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
> But people are less likely to share all the times the AI failed in some ridiculous way. I have not noticed this: people love sharing AI failing in ridiculous ways.
283.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
Thanks! I haven't really shared it with many people yet - if you have any feedback I'd be happy to hear.
284.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
I'm looking for such an algorithm, with intermediate goals: you start at the bottom, go up, and as you reach the goal, more maze appears. I left out some unimportant details :)
285.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
> The book isn’t super deep, but it has a fun set of projects and further ideas/reading as well. Does it just regurgitate the well known maze generating algorithms? These generally do not lead to mazes interesting for humans...
286.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
Yes, this page is a good overview of the sorry state of maze generation. The maze-creating algorithms might be interesting for computer scientists, but they're terrible at creating mazes interesting for humans! First, I'm not su
287.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
Also you didn't mention you send $3.5 of the $5 to charity! Their Discord has three members, so perhaps it's not very popular? The "creator" lists themselves as "Peoples Grocers" and their website is a weird no
288.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
> I did it initially because apparently playing games on a shared screen is better for my kid. Explain please?
289.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
They're not banning "AI programming": just specifically large language models.
290.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
My father loves cars, but he also walks everywhere, so the former.
291.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
Could easily be, yes. And they'd be right not to invest in OP's skills. (To explicitly state the obvious: I'm not saying OP's a bad person for doing this, just saying the employers were right not to invest in them...)
292.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
> people did stop walking everywhere. I didn't. Yesterday I walked 11 km for errands. Today I took a detour when walking to work, a more scenic route with less traffic. For me walking is not much slower than using public transport (
293.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
> I've worked for 35ish companies It seems they were correct not to invest in your skills. I've worked for six companies over almost 20 years. The majority invested in my skills, and I hope that investment has paid off for them
294.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
Well, I'm entertained!
295.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
I use Gemini-CLI at work, and haven't noticed anything. I use Google Jules (free tier) on a toy project much more heavily and can't complain. I think sometimes the prompts take longer than they used to, but I couldn't care le
296.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
I answered that in the comment you're replying to. If you want a more authoritative answer: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/Reference/A...
297.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
There are some good choices, but also some atrocious ones. My favourite coding font[0] is missing. [0]: https://www.recursive.design/ and also available on Google Fonts[1] [1]: https://fonts.google.com/speci
298.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
Ah, you have a button for the toggle! Did you know that you can conform to the user's light/dark preference with CSS? Like this: :root { --varname: #FFE; } @media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) { :root { --var
299.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
> ⸻ Wow, I'm impressed at your usage of this. Apparently it's 0x2E3B, named "three-em dash". You must be human!
300.
▲
by
tasuki
7mo ago
Shouldn't the first chart have a logarithmic scale on the vertical? I don't trust anything using linear scales where they're a bad fit...
More ›