taspeotis

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by taspeotis 17d ago

   17 years is a rookie number. Take C# auto-properties, for example: 19 years ago! Now try asking, "When did Java get auto-properties?"
2. 2.▲
   by taspeotis 17d ago

   Sorry I only just set -xXx360NoScopexXx=4G to run that latest version without hitting OOM and you are right, it is indeed quite fast with G1.
3. 3.▲
   by taspeotis 17d ago

   Knock knock Who's there? long pause Java
4. 4.▲
   by taspeotis 20d ago

   +1 for Kagi, even if Maps and Shopping and Images aren’t as good as Google (tbh their Images search is good enough 8/10 times) they’ve got the actual web search stuff working quite well.
5. 5.▲
   by taspeotis 28d ago

   I'm always hesitant to trust these things after one of them turned off CRL checking because external connectivity = bad!!1
6. 6.▲
   by taspeotis 28d ago

   Not to shit on their effort or anything, but it looks like a VS Code fork + an agent panel which is very ... late 2024 energy?
7. 7.▲
   by taspeotis 1mo ago

   It's not shitposting, it's ironic shitposting-adjacent.
8. 8.▲
   by taspeotis 1mo ago

   You're missing the meta: upvoting stuff like this is ironic shitposting-adjacent, so people upvote it.
9. 9.▲
   by taspeotis 1mo ago

   I. Am. Lion. Man.
10. 10.▲
    by taspeotis 1mo ago

    Yelling At My Laptop
11. 11.▲
    by taspeotis 1mo ago

    I have the same experience - npm was bad, now it is fast enough.
12. 12.▲
    by taspeotis 2mo ago

    I bet those decade+ sites have been silently upgraded to TLS 1.3 too! Where are the complaints for that?
13. 13.▲
    by taspeotis 2mo ago

    Does a set of all sets contain itself?
14. 14.▲
    by taspeotis 2mo ago

    My completely unfounded pet theory is that it’s been ruined by the masses. Claude Code in the hands of normies spamming “3” and “y” to send their transcripts to Anthropic. Rated “3” simply because they are not software developers and are ju
15. 15.▲
    by taspeotis 2mo ago

    I rawdog Claude Code with --dangerously-skip-permissions and the only fucky wucky it's made is invoking git checkout wrong and losing some code in the working tree. It has done this thrice, the first two times I caught it in the act an
16. 16.▲
    by taspeotis 2mo ago

    I quite like this one https://youtu.be/U4FNBMZsqrY
17. 17.▲
    by taspeotis 2mo ago

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGFhc8R_uO4
18. 18.▲
    by taspeotis 2mo ago

    Is it any coincidence that Rovo rhymes with "no, NO!"
19. 19.▲
    by taspeotis 2mo ago

    I think HP had a big investment in Itanium and even sued Oracle to get them to keep supporting Itanium (they had contractually agreed to it, but Itanium was such a dead end...)
20. 20.▲
    by taspeotis 2mo ago

    There’s an article? All these years…
21. 21.▲
    by taspeotis 3mo ago

    Why are you asking the LLM to code? Can’t you do that by yourself?
22. 22.▲
    by taspeotis 3mo ago

    I feel Claude Code has added (and removed?) a feature that forks a subagent from the parent context, so it’s still isolated but it’s more of a continuation of what you were doing in one narrow direction and then it dies. Rather than a blank
23. 23.▲
    Progress asks its ShareFile customers to turn their software off to be secure(reddit.com)

    1 points by taspeotis 3mo ago|0 comments
24. 24.▲
    by taspeotis 3mo ago

    The harness is super important, what tools are available and the system prompts vary from harness to harness. Anthropic seems to have a modest lead on their harness and models, so it’s a best-of-both-worlds scenario. > I'm not sure
25. 25.▲
    by taspeotis 3mo ago

    > Claude Opus 4.7 and later Opus models, Claude Fable 5, Claude Mythos 5, Claude Mythos Preview, and Claude Sonnet 5 use a newer tokenizer that contributes to their improved performance on a wide range of tasks. This tokenizer produces a
26. 26.▲
    by taspeotis 3mo ago

    I thought this was a feature that they tidied up your data
27. 27.▲
    by taspeotis 3mo ago

    Did anyone try to send a long email that pushed context close to the limit to try and make the agent a bit fuzzy on its original directive not to leak the secrets?
28. 28.▲
    by taspeotis 3mo ago

    Perfect, thank you
29. 29.▲
    by taspeotis 3mo ago

    So I got turned off the OpenAI form because it’s pretty heavily geared towards “enterprise” which I’m not. But I’ll have a stab at it later. What’s the equivalent form for Anthropic please? The closest I got from Google was Claude Security’
30. 30.▲
    by taspeotis 3mo ago

    I don't know what the solution to this is, but I find it somewhat unfair that I pay money to Anthropic, and I pay money to OpenAI, and neither of them will let me use their best models for securing the software I work on. Admittedly