Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tambienben
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
Regulation by whome, exactly? At least in its current state, I get to choose between my state-sponsored media attacks... If your opaque point is that we need to break these companies up for... reasons... (Because maybe Russia-something?) Th
32.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
I think the reasons for "Facebooks fake news problem" even being a story are two-fold: elites in the corporate "journalism" cabal understand that its a great distraction from the important discussion of data retention.
33.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
Your brazen support of censorship is troubling.
34.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
Arguably, they already don't have a future.
35.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
If you don't like the power these companies have, leave their "services". https://diasporafoundation.org https://kolabnow.com
36.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
This is conjecture, but I imagine you need to be good at other skills in order to gain attention from that kind of employer. The social engineering training may come after.
37.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
Allahu Akbar.
38.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
>inherently limited in terms of invasiveness. But are they, really?
39.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
I think the premise here is a false dichotomy. Consider why many U.S. companies have moved to mexico--the domestic economy since 2008 has been significant factor. I think that its in everyone's best interest to consider yourself first;
40.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
You lose the moral high ground once you practice any one of those--at which point you're actively undermining your own message in the public eye. Hell, your opposition will probably be accusing you of those things (or planting people w
41.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
>It's better than sitting on the couch and reading about the things you dont like in the world. Or killing people you don't like. Or injuring others. Or looting. Or destroying property. Basically anything that isn't those
42.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
Most sites solve this problem with a combination of 2fA and at least one security question. Having my phone number isn't even good 2fA.
43.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
How much do you actually need to know about someone to serve up email to them?
44.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
Hypothetically speaking, what's keeping this from being instigated by any three letter agency under the guise of Russian influence?
45.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
That's a false equivalency. Yes, Russia has a horrible human rights record. That doesn't speak directly, in any way, to the rattling of sabres over alleged (or hypothetical) political sabotage.
46.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
I would argue that it is (also) warfare waged against the citizenry by established domestic political parties/players.
47.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
I agree. Is that a reference to a quote? The more popular anti-establishment rhetoric becomes, the more that rhetoric will be adopted by those who wish to use it toward their own ends. Be wary of what you assume to be true. I'm thinkin
48.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
I prefer darktable's workflow to Rawtherapee's for organizing photos. I just wish it would quit crashing on OSX.
49.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
I don't think Russia is the bogeyman you think it is.
50.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
>YOU are the one who is demonizing someone else (Snowden) Demonizing, no. Simply expressing a lack of faith in human nature.
51.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
I concede to your point. I should probably have used different language.
52.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
>The authors of software such as TLS, Whonix, Tor, Tails, Debian, all have a certain amount of credibility... All of which are open source == independently verifiable. TOR would not be recommended as highly as it is if it were a closed-s
53.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
So you would trust anything he says on face value? Regardless of what he might stand to gain? My only point is that having a substantial amount of faith in anyone, when the stakes are high, is folly. That's the entire point of blockcha
54.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
>So the claim that Snowden is a proponent of Zcash because he has invested in it has no merit. Maybe you're using hyperbole. The /suspicion/ at least, has plenty of merit. I agree that doing something like that would go ag
55.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
For those of you who are down voting, perhaps you could explain why this case might be different from any other value hype. What happened to trust no one--verify?
56.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
I've put my full focus on trying to develope different skills after being used by someone. I'm much better off spending my time on me rather than anyone who doesn't appreciate it. The way I figure, if someone appreciates me e
57.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
Any idea how well alternatives like zcoin might hold up over time?
58.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
https://openbazaar.org
59.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
I'm suspicious of this.
60.
▲
by
tambienben
9y ago
This might be especially true when the source of the official explanation has skin in the game. Politics is a hairy business.
More ›