3 ms·

Regulation by whome, exactly? At least in its current state, I get to choose between my state-sponsored media attacks... If your opaque point is that we need t

Regulation by whome, exactly? At least in its current state, I get to choose between my state-sponsored media attacks... If your opaque point is that we need to break these companies up for... reasons... (Because maybe Russia-something?) Then I suppose I disagree with you less, but not on that principle. It seems to me that these problems are better solved through education, rather than censorship & policing. But educating is impossible because it would lead to a more informed public.

wybiral 9y ago
> Regulation by whome, exactly? Regulation by publicly elected and representative officials in our democracy. > It seems to me that these problems are better solved through education, rather than censorship & policing. I'm not talking about censorship. My point was regarding the mass data collection and analysis of our personal information that's being done at an impressive scale by these for-profit companies without any form of oversight or transparency. It isn't cool when the NSA does it and it isn't cool when they're doing it either. Especially not if they're actually profiting from selling our data to other people who are doing whoknowswhat. There is no incentive for them to be responsible.
- tambienben 9y ago
  Publicly elected officials on what level? The FCC? What powers are we giving them? When I hear a Senator Dianne Feinstein scolding a panel of tech giants, I don't hear a benevolent leader with our best interests at heart, I hear someone infantalizing me for their own gain. If the topic is data retention, let's target everyone. No one should be safe unless they can justify it under scrutiny & demonstrate security. If the topic is "fake news", then its a battle of definitions, & regulation is unconstitutional on any government level--no matter how you spin it.

3 ms·

Regulation by whome, exactly? At least in its current state, I get to choose between my state-sponsored media attacks... If your opaque point is that we need t

by tambienben 9y ago

wybiral 9y ago
> Regulation by whome, exactly? Regulation by publicly elected and representative officials in our democracy. > It seems to me that these problems are better solved through education, rather than censorship & policing. I'm not talking about censorship. My point was regarding the mass data collection and analysis of our personal information that's being done at an impressive scale by these for-profit companies without any form of oversight or transparency. It isn't cool when the NSA does it and it isn't cool when they're doing it either. Especially not if they're actually profiting from selling our data to other people who are doing whoknowswhat. There is no incentive for them to be responsible.
- tambienben 9y ago
  Publicly elected officials on what level? The FCC? What powers are we giving them? When I hear a Senator Dianne Feinstein scolding a panel of tech giants, I don't hear a benevolent leader with our best interests at heart, I hear someone infantalizing me for their own gain. If the topic is data retention, let's target everyone. No one should be safe unless they can justify it under scrutiny & demonstrate security. If the topic is "fake news", then its a battle of definitions, & regulation is unconstitutional on any government level--no matter how you spin it.