suraci

26 ms·

211.
by suraci 2y ago
that's so interesting, the 'dead' vs. 'killed'-ish selective bias in language is something I habitually notice i checked latest headlines about gaza by reuter > Israeli air strike kills nine in Gaza, local minist
212.
by suraci 2y ago
funny, because it seems like the president of south korea is more dangerous than DPRK to the country...
213.
China Is No Climate Savior(foreignpolicy.com)
6 points by suraci 2y ago|2 comments
214.
India's $23B plan to rival China factories to lapse after it disappoints(reuters.com)
3 points by suraci 2y ago|1 comments
215.
by suraci 2y ago
nah, china will take over taiwan very easily, the tough part is not occupation, is how to make it quick with least damage, and the further governance
216.
Starmer warns Putin of 'severe consequences' if he breaches peace deal(theguardian.com)
3 points by suraci 2y ago|2 comments
217.
by suraci 2y ago
Common points: 1. allies of the United States, 2. are experiencing political turmoil, 3. regimes are in urgent need of US support. imo, during the spread of avian influenza, exporting eggs (especially additional exports) is extremely costly
218.
by suraci 2y ago
sorry for any possible offence of my following words, because my english is so poor that i may not able to pick more polite and euphemistic words You are too arrogant. Your ignorance limits your understanding of yourself, and I have no way
219.
by suraci 2y ago
you are right this is the real soft power this is the power makes you believe there're genocide in xinjiang without any solid evidence this is the power makes every discussion about gaza were flagged here the real power, it's soft
220.
Counter-terror police investigating 'unprecedented' fire that shut Heathrow(theguardian.com)
7 points by suraci 2y ago|3 comments
221.
by suraci 2y ago
it's a lost cause in 1960s, but not now
222.
by suraci 2y ago
it may be the last grasping straw of the drowning market
223.
Studies show strong public support for China's political system(jasonhickel.substack.com)
2 points by suraci 2y ago|2 comments
224.
by suraci 2y ago
what you said is how China planed before 2019, reality's development makes it impossible to act as previously planned, now, there's 0 chance that the CCP can take back Taiwan without bombs however, it really depends on the definit
225.
The Vision of Pentagon's Chief Strategist: Blocking China(aspistrategist.org.au)
1 points by suraci 2y ago|0 comments
226.
by suraci 2y ago
> according to anonymous American officials — the Pentagon planned to brief Musk on Friday about the U.S. military’s plan for any war that might break out with China. really want to the detail of what they talked about
227.
by suraci 2y ago
nevermind, wrong words have been eliminated
228.
by suraci 2y ago
the last time i check it, it was 'relaim' you can still see the word in the url that's why i said 'weird', it's very abnormal for the economist, looks like someone had gone astray in his thinking, fortunately,
229.
by suraci 2y ago
btw, here's an article about it in Jan https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2025/01/china-suddenly-... Surely the D-day is coming
230.
by suraci 2y ago
weird that the economist uses the word 'reclaim' instead of 'invade'
231.
China's military is going to war against itself(thehill.com)
8 points by suraci 2y ago|0 comments
232.
by suraci 2y ago
So true, If you do not believe it, try asking chatgpt what happened in Tiananmen Square in 1989
233.
by suraci 2y ago
> but they are likely to be some of the best educated about China the best educated about China? Not at all the best educated about China by MSM? Yes
234.
by suraci 2y ago
Which its is it that your its are referring to?
235.
Would Americans Go to War Against China?(foreignaffairs.com)
3 points by suraci 2y ago|1 comments
236.
Western Ignorance: Failure to See China Beyond the Party(thechinaacademy.org)
31 points by suraci 2y ago|31 comments
237.
Canada should mend ties with China to build a new world (trade) order(theglobeandmail.com)
5 points by suraci 2y ago|2 comments
238.
by suraci 2y ago
it's recently updated: https://x.com/TravelGoC/status/1901787664707211761 unfortunately, it's not easy to determine which part was updated since there are too many risks associated with traveling to Chin
239.
by suraci 2y ago
Barbaric, backward, but extremely dangerous
240.
China travel advice – Risk level: HIGH(travel.gc.ca)
5 points by suraci 2y ago|4 comments

More ›