sumeno

34 ms·

691.
by sumeno 4y ago
Because it is accurate
692.
by sumeno 4y ago
If the barrier to a checkmark is $8 then all the scammers are going to have checkmarks too
693.
by sumeno 4y ago
Everything survives until it doesn't
694.
by sumeno 4y ago
The vast vast majority of interviewers and hiring managers in our industry are going to be white men. They will consciously or unconsciously tend to favor people like them, other white men, regardless of other factors due to human nature. E
695.
by sumeno 4y ago
If I help an elderly person across the street am I discriminating against the young? Are VA hospitals discriminating against non-veterans? If my neighbor's house is on fire is the fire department discriminating against me when they don
696.
by sumeno 4y ago
Yes, when a privileged group begins to face a more equitable situation they often feel discriminated against, it doesn't make it true. White men still have incredible advantages in this industry and the half hearted diversity initiativ
697.
by sumeno 4y ago
Because we work in an industry and are posting on a website that is predominantly male and white. Any time even the smallest measures are taken to improve the balance there's just a bunch of whining about being discriminated against. I
698.
by sumeno 4y ago
Few things make me feel as gross about reading this website than all the whining about discrimination against white men.
699.
by sumeno 4y ago
Are you kidding? Six weeks is laughably short for paternity leave. Taking care of a 2 month old is a 24/7 job and doing it with two people is insanely difficult, that people are forced to do it with one is mindboggling.
700.
by sumeno 4y ago
Whether they should or not is a different question than whether that's what their rules state and whether the standards should be clear
701.
by sumeno 4y ago
YouTube's guidance says the following is ok: Abbreviated, censored, or light profanity (like “hell” or “damn”) in the title, thumbnail, or video. Moderate profanity (like “shit” or “bitch”) used in the video. Infrequent usage of strong
702.
by sumeno 4y ago
The video is on YouTube and YouTube's guidance says that the following won't be age restricted: Abbreviated, censored, or light profanity (like “hell” or “damn”) in the title, thumbnail, or video. Moderate profanity (like “shit” o
703.
by sumeno 4y ago
Find the documentation on YouTube for that boundary and compare it to the video.
704.
by sumeno 4y ago
Color me surprised that the person claiming to have enjoyed a crypto game is trying to shill a different crypto game
705.
by sumeno 4y ago
One implies he was correct
706.
by sumeno 4y ago
and when it stops the vast majority of people will have no reason to use cryptocurrency at all and it will go back to being a niche thing for libertarian nerds
707.
by sumeno 4y ago
The president can only pardon federal crimes. The laws being broken are state laws.
708.
by sumeno 4y ago
> I'll be the begrudging devils advocate for a decision that is sure to have devastating consequences for poor women in red states. The devil already has 6 seats on the supreme court, he doesn't need you to advocate for him
709.
by sumeno 4y ago
There are other categories where they do recommend IKEA as the top option despite not getting a commission
710.
by sumeno 4y ago
And likely way more than would be involved in cryptocurrency if it wasn't a speculative asset
711.
by sumeno 4y ago
I thought the same thing after 2017, but so far there has been an endless supply of new people ready to get scammed.
712.
by sumeno 4y ago
Likely true, but also likely won't matter since Musk has ignored the NLRB before. Until NLRB has real teeth it will be cheaper for companies to violate their policies and pay fines rather than allow workers to organize.
713.
by sumeno 4y ago
No, they kept Elon
714.
by sumeno 4y ago
Consequences like... being banned by Twitter perhaps?
715.
by sumeno 4y ago
Have you seen the rest of crypto? It's not very surprising
716.
by sumeno 4y ago
Who is disadvantaged by using someone's preferred pronouns? or not using racist slurs?
717.
by sumeno 4y ago
This kind of argument has been used to deny people their rights forever. In the 90s and 00s one of the arguments was that if you legalized same-sex marriage then bestiality would be next. These arguments are just a new flavor of that so tha
718.
by sumeno 4y ago
He should just use the pronouns people prefer and not call people the N-word, but instead he has to have big sit down conversations where he explains why actually it's ok for him to use the N-word and ignore people's pronouns. A b
719.
by sumeno 4y ago
> He also questioned their use of preferred pronouns and led a discussion about “who can refer to another person as the N word.” This is a guy who just wants to be shitty to people and not have consequences https://archive.ph&
720.
by sumeno 4y ago
For child porn

More ›