4 ms·

Because it is accurate

• Kiro 4y ago
  I agree but it's noise and has nothing to do with the topic. Why do you want to encourage that instead of actually discussing the article? I was glad to see it flagged and dead after my comment, but then someone even vouched for it. Like it's such an important comment that it needs to be heard. Even the premise is questionable (does quality presuppose it is moral?) but it's obvious what the parent means and commenting on it is just bait.
  • sdiacom 4y ago
    The article is about the low-quality implementation of platforms selling NFTs. I don't see how discussing the lack of quality of NFTs themselves, the "product" they sell, falls too far off the tree.
    • Kiro 4y ago
      That's a really far-fetched and generous interpretation. The comment is obviously just sarcastic NFT bashing, picking up on the lowest denominator in the parent comment and not talking about the platform or article at all. Come on, we can do better. Instigating another generic NFT flame war is pointless and off-topic.