stusmall

13 ms·

121.
by stusmall 3y ago
In some use cases the company is paying for the encoding, but the client is doing the decoding. As long as the client can decode the handful of images on the page fast enough for the human to not notice, its fine. Meanwhile any percentage
122.
by stusmall 3y ago
This isn't one though. I think the issue he is talking about is around the CVEs that came out with the HTTP3 implementation. This is an area of very active and complex development.
123.
by stusmall 3y ago
Cargo run just builds and runs the produced binary. It doesn't even install it
124.
by stusmall 3y ago
Thank you for the source.
125.
by stusmall 3y ago
> There's still Garmin... but honestly, I don't understand why people insist on paying hundreds of dollars for a "name", Another way of saying "paying for a name" is "paying for trust". When you r
126.
by stusmall 3y ago
Have you looked at OpenCost? It's more k8s focused but of a similar idea
127.
by stusmall 3y ago
Check the end of the article for frame rates for different titles.
128.
by stusmall 3y ago
Seriously. Even worse there are things I want, I know the name and the brand but I can't order from Amazon because of the high risk of counterfeits. I hope they either get their house in order or someone eats their lunch.
129.
by stusmall 3y ago
The idea that reintroducing an animal is telling someone "how to live" is wild. They existed there long before us, raising livestock can still happen with them there, and ranching existed in Colorado along side wolves long before
130.
by stusmall 3y ago
I think it is intuitive once you spend the time to read the docs. I think folks expect they can pick it up and hack at it like many other languages. It's one that is worth spending the time to work through the pills, understand what
131.
by stusmall 3y ago
> Not only that, they are impacting the actual languages people use. Why use some new / esoteric language that an LLM doesn't know much about, when you can get the same job done much faster using a language that the LLM knows w
132.
by stusmall 3y ago
One possible explanation for this can be a mistake in caching. While it is tempting to log in and see if you can see other people's consoles... that just might put you in the cache for someone else to see. There is no way for us to k
133.
by stusmall 3y ago
Huh. It's really nice to see actual metrics. I live in a rural area and get my internet through a fixed wireless provider. For a while I'd been wondering if it was worth giving Starlink a try While this is usually a bit more ba
134.
by stusmall 3y ago
>The way I see it, Rust is still fundamentally designed to work at a higher level of abstraction than C, and is still mostly dependent on C (even C++ really, due to LLVM/Clang). I think this might touch on part of the problem. Rust
135.
by stusmall 3y ago
I've introduced mypy to a project in the past. It was part of taking an older, low quality code base and stabilizing it into something useful. Sometimes you can't just throw it all away and start over and need a gradual approach
136.
by stusmall 3y ago
If they wanted to add a backdoor for feds there are better ways to do it. This is just stupid, lazy engineering. Not everything has to be some grand conspiracy.
137.
by stusmall 3y ago
A lot gets made of the inflation of CVSS scores but this is an interesting low ball of a score. It's a bit of a bold move to mark this one as a 9.8. If root access available to remote, unauthenticated users via the simplest means pos
138.
by stusmall 3y ago
I feel that. I've worked in those environments. A previous job we had a C89 code base that very deliberately could only build with certain older compilers. It was made to be able to target ~20 year old OSes and embedded environments
139.
by stusmall 3y ago
That is the opposite problem from what the person mentioned, and not a real problem. Rust is extremely good about backwards compatibility. With only a few very extreme exceptions you can take anything written from 1.0 on and build it wi
140.
by stusmall 3y ago
Same. I used to really enjoy going to them. A few of my favorite local ones tried to become a global online only thing which just kills the point for me. I spent enough time on calls during the day, I don't want to do it for fun too
141.
by stusmall 3y ago
I'm glad I'm not the only one who had that jump out to them. I don't think I've ever had any OS specific functionality with a keyboard. Looking at the USB HID scan code list I can't even think what I'd want o
142.
by stusmall 3y ago
I think they are referring to regular, scheduled, private standing meetings between a manager and their subordinate. They are often called "1 on 1s". Of course he talks to folks in private when needed.
143.
by stusmall 3y ago
I think the big improvement would be consistency. Either all servers would be correct or all servers would be incorrect. The step where "Since they were unable to determine what was causing the erroneous orders they reacted by uninst
144.
by stusmall 3y ago
> That costs money? They're literally the revenue service, I'm sure we can find some money for them. I completely agree but I think its worth pointing out the recent controversy over better funding the IRS. Better funding the
145.
by stusmall 3y ago
No offense, I appreciate the idea, but I'm not looking for suggestions. I only posted this here as an example of how the system is failing even for people with high quality insurance.
146.
by stusmall 3y ago
Woooofftt. That's bad advice and in an even worse order. There are a bunch of steps in between getting denied and just YOLOing it out of pocket. It looks like going through the insurance company's peer to peer process is probab
147.
by stusmall 3y ago
I have great insurance through my employer. Last week my spouse was suppose to go in for a surgery that multiple doctors made it clear she needed. We were on the books for months for the surgery. Insurance denied it the day before, throw
148.
by stusmall 3y ago
I'd be nervous owning property in a market like that. When times get tough markets like that will get hit hard as investors pull out. I'm going to take a wild guess, are you in the suburban Houston area? I've got friends an
149.
by stusmall 3y ago
It's so mind blowing to me that it made it past corporate legal. I don't get what defense there could be besides "lmao try and stop me, nerds"
150.
by stusmall 3y ago
That is because features might be feature complete and usable, but not consider stable yet and thus not part of stable builds. This because rust takes backwards compatibility seriously, it isn't an example of it breaking it.

More ›