striking

58 ms·

781.
by striking 5y ago
Those are also in DDG.
782.
by striking 5y ago
From the fine reply's fine link: > Of course, I did push back on Felleisen. But there was a limit to how hard I could push. Again—I was merely a guest. In the moment, I was struggling mostly to keep my emotions in check. I did assu
783.
by striking 5y ago
I use it without SSR, just because it's a well-known and very well-maintained set of configs. Having to upgrade webpack et al. up major versions sucks.
784.
by striking 5y ago
I hate to quote the article so directly, but to make the headline a little less click-baity: > Put it this way: The neurons that represented the smell of an apple in May and those that represented the same smell in June were as different
785.
by striking 5y ago
It costs them more to serve these resources to you. They're not obligated to deal with customers whose use of the resources goes beyond the ordinary or regular.
786.
by striking 5y ago
Can't delete or modify existing blocks yet, sadly.
787.
by striking 6y ago
From the article: > Roku requested exceptions that would break the YouTube experience and limit our ability to update YouTube in order to fix issues or add new features. For example, by not supporting open-source video codecs, you wouldn
788.
by striking 6y ago
It's worth noting that the link you've posted is mostly about the CIA, and it debunks their use of false flag tools.
789.
by striking 6y ago
The future is `git restore` and `git switch`, which clear up the ambiguity between different modes of reset/checkout.
790.
by striking 6y ago
Have you tried some of the type info based rules in typescript-eslint? They're fantastic. No floating promises, no bad templating, etc.
791.
by striking 6y ago
> nine congressmen have asked for an investigation Is that change from within? Is this not proving my point? > else they wouldn't have even started that research department to begin with You couldn't think of a single other
792.
by striking 6y ago
I disagree that this is even a factor to consider, and that we should be rigorous when assigning probabilities to events. Seriously, what meaningful and controversial change has the rank-and-file (or even the managerial staff) at Facebook m
793.
by striking 6y ago
There are other high paying jobs out there, and I'd like to know where this "change from the inside" thing comes from. I've not seen anything that indicates that that's true for Facebook, and have seen a few things
794.
So Good, it works on Barbed Wire (2001)(sigcon.com)
3 points by striking 6y ago|0 comments
795.
StaffEng(staffeng.com)
2 points by striking 6y ago|0 comments
796.
by striking 6y ago
You can usually be un-IP-banned by going to a particular URL. It's usually not permanent. As for the thing you were banned for, do you feel like HN owes you the ability to make an account per comment?
797.
by striking 6y ago
What, so we should all tolerate disagreeable people just because they can lay down a few lines of code? It's not "whether the interviewer likes you", it's whether you can work with other people without taking an emotiona
798.
by striking 6y ago
> fixing the password security would've required breaking everyone's ability to commit to the PHP codebase The parameterized queries could have been fixed, though, right? And you can progressively update people's passwords
799.
by striking 6y ago
OnePlus ships phones with unlockable bootloaders. They're great! However, when you unlock your bootloader, you lose access to things that demand devices be trusted by Google. So Netflix no longer even shows up in the Play Store, you ca
800.
by striking 6y ago
Testing with the database isn't particularly efficient. If you have enough tests, it becomes worth it to mock whatever would touch the database just so the tests pass in a reasonable amount of time.
801.
by striking 6y ago
Definitely, and there's nothing wrong with maintaining the status quo if it's working really well as-is. But I think it can be pretty surprising to folks that haven't had an opportunity to play with TS, just how powerful the
802.
by striking 6y ago
It is unsound. One of the most impactful unsoundnesses is when you cast one array type to another compatible but not exactly equivalent type, and then write to the array. In Flow (another type system) you simply can't do that without m
803.
by striking 6y ago
I think if you're of the opinion that installing any toolchain (as opposed to writing files right to disk and having Node read them as-is) is "bloat" then obviously it will be hard for me to convince you it's not. I can
804.
by striking 6y ago
Why write assertions when TS can figure them out for you? And "tooling/dep bloat" is not a real thing. You point TSC at your code for prod, https://www.npmjs.com/package/ts-node-dev in dev. Frontend is e
805.
by striking 6y ago
I hear that, and I don't disagree with much of it. Just here to say that I work with a codebase that's typechecked and functional :)
806.
by striking 6y ago
It's not an either/or, the same way people who have access to professional editing staff probably still have a spell checker enabled in their word processor. If I have to hunt down each error caused by each refactor to the codebas
807.
by striking 6y ago
Type checking doesn't necessarily make your code look like Java. TypeScript enhances refactoring regardless of whether you're OOP or functional. Your comments about frontend TS don't seem super coherent to me, but if my read
808.
by striking 6y ago
I'd really like to hear what alternatives you have in mind for code in the JavaScript family that needs to have types. At my workplace, types are an important part of our workflow. We've been using Flow as a type checker but are c
809.
by striking 6y ago
This article links to https://www.foxnews.com/us/chicago-sees-spike-in-carjackings... , which links to the actual source article https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/2021/2/22/22295471&#
810.
by striking 6y ago
This is a bizarre rationalization of a misleading post. So what if Chrome has features, some of which you don't care for? That doesn't make the post right.

More ›